You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #74: It's the divisiveness that's objectionable. Personally, I think the OP doesn't have clue when it [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-27-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #49
74. It's the divisiveness that's objectionable. Personally, I think the OP doesn't have clue when it
comes to "hippies" or "boomers" or the 60s or whatever else he's whinging about. He's just spouting off the same pre-digested rubbish that's gone around for years, thanks to the right wing media megaphone.

It's not impressive material in the first place, and it's certainly not some startling new and original thought on the part of the OP. Not to mention that broadbrush condemnations and wholly innaccurate generalizations do not make for a persuasive argument.

I'd even agree with the OP to some degree in regard to the Tom Joad part of his argument. But he's already slandered me and declared me his enemy, so why should I pay any attention to what he has to say?

And I also think you are wrong about how you're reading this:
. What the hell do my personal hurt feelings, or my emotional commitment to my social and cultural identity or personal preferences mean when compared to the life and death struggle that the working class has been forced into, and the serious work we have ahead of us?


Emotional attachment to "social and cultural identity" is a universal human trait; so of course, when your entire group is being attacked, there is an instinctive protective reaction.

However, I think it's something deeper and bigger than that. It is our hippie committment to truth. We, who experienced the history firsthand, have an obligation to hold the truth of those events clearly in our memories and teach our stories to our children and speak out against ALL attempts to distort or revise or refashion the truth of those days.

I don't feel his insults on a personal level, I just see more sad evidence of how pervasively the forces of the Right have infected our entire national consciousness with falsehoods that become accepted as "reality".

We old DU hippies are hard-working antibodies, rushing to dis-infect the body politic by speaking our truth. It's not personal, it's our duty.

Lastly, given a choice, I'd LOVE to see the younger generations get busy and change the world like we tried to do. More than anything, I'd LOVE to see them succeed. And I'd love to help, of course, 'cuz I ain't dead yet, and I've lived my whole life for changing the world.

But I'm sorry, children who swear at their grandmas and call them names and throw spitwads at them are rude, and I do not care to make common cause with rude people.

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC