You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you think getting patted down entering a stadium is unconstitutional? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:55 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you think getting patted down entering a stadium is unconstitutional?
Advertisements [?]
I SAY IF YOU WANT TO LOOK IN MY BACKPACK FINE. OR IF YOU WANT TO WAVE A METAL DETECTOR WAND OVER ME, FINE........BUT KEEP YOUR EFFING HANDS OFF OF MY BODY.

GOOD FOR THESE 49ER FANS TO TAKE A STAND.

TERRA TERRA :eyes:

====================================================================================




Suit over Niners' pat-downs of fans is revived



Bob Egelko, Chronicle Staff Writer

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

(03-02) 15:44 PST SAN FRANCISCO -- The California Supreme Court reinstated a lawsuit Monday challenging pat-downs of fans entering San Francisco 49ers games, saying spectators don't necessarily agree to be searched when they buy their tickets.

But the court also indicated that ticket-holders could have a tough time showing that the pat-downs, ordered by the National Football League in 2005 to ward off potential terrorists, were an unreasonable invasion of privacy. A majority of the justices said courts should respect private businesses' assessments of their own safety needs.

"The state constitutional right of privacy does not grant courts a roving commission to second-guess security decisions at private entertainment events or to micromanage interactions between private parties," Justice Ming Chin said in an opinion signed by four of the seven justices.

The justices agreed unanimously, however, that lower courts should not have dismissed a suit by two 49ers fans merely because they had bought tickets for the 2006 season after learning about the searches.

Instead, the court said, a judge should consider the 49ers' reasons for the pat-downs and examine whether the husband-and-wife fans had actually consented to be searched. The court returned the case to a Superior Court judge for a possible trial on those issues.

The result could set new standards for privacy rights in California.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/03/02/BA6I167PS1.DTL&type=49ers



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC