You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #16: From what I have read female circumcision is very brutal [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-26-09 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. From what I have read female circumcision is very brutal
and it is done when the girls are turning into adolescents. What happens to baby boys is bad enough, losing the foreskin and all. It really seems un-necessary. I read a book called the 'Secret of Joy' quite some time ago. It was about an African girl and it was very graphic about the pain and suffering. The story not only chronicled the removal of the clitoris and inner labia, but the outer lips were scraped on the inside and stuck together and the legs bound until the vulva was fused. Most of this is designed so that a man can rip them open when he penetrates a virgin. If the woman can actually give birth with out ripping clear to her anus, and survives she is some times nearly sewn shut again.

I heard an Egyptian Doctor trying to justify this practice as it was being done in his country. I'm not sure if the procedure is as complete and brutal or as primitive as having your female relatives grab you, hold you down and cut you up, so that you can always look like a little girl. Maybe they do it in a Dr's office with some anesthetic and it's elective so you will look 'neater' but this Dr. said it was for the husband, so he would be less likely to cheat and he would be happier with his wife.

And finally this leads me to talk about the designer lips fad, since we have all seen porn star vulva's. Most of them don't have a lot of fancy extras. They are plain, simple, and well manicured. Women have an option to have themselves modified these days. It's a choice I suppose. But it were to happen at all it should be because the women elects to have what ever fixed up a bit not to have her female anatomy completely removed so she can never feel any pleasure or never experience an orgasm. It's that damn Madonna/Whore complex, again. You can't be a virginal, motherly, wife material female and be able to be a fully functional woman. Women really have had a lot to over come in this world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC