You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #9: Dr.Ravitch is correct that there are other factors that affect student learning BUT [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dr.Ravitch is correct that there are other factors that affect student learning BUT
the greatest factor BY FAR is the effectiveness of the classroom teacher. An effective teacher outweighs parental incompetence, poverty, and many other factors. If you consider that an average teacher can move a child one grade level in a year, then it has been shown that a very good or an exceptional teacher can actually move kids up to 1.5 grade levels in one year.

An ineffective teacher can move kids only 0.5 grade levels in one year.

Why can't we reward the good and the exceptional and get rid of the poor? Why is that so difficult?

A child that gets 2 or more ineffective teachers in a row (which often happens in poor schools) can put kids so far behind that they can never catch up.


While the OP was correct about many things in NCLB, the entire bill was not bad. The best thing that NCLB has done is to shed light on to all kids. Schools can no longer hide kids that are failing and falling behind. No longer can poor kids or EC kids or minority kids be pushed aside to highlight the scores of those for whom school has traditionally worked. The Obama administration has introduced some ideas to fix some of the shortcomings with NCLB. Will it get it all right? No. But it is a start and to summarily dismiss it as Dr. Ravitch seems to do doesn't help solve the problem.

I said last week that I believed those teachers in RI deserved to be fired. I still believe that. Not because I despise teachers. I love teaching. I believe it is an art and a calling.

I believe they were correctly fired because they sold out that calling. They were provided some reasonable remedies they could take to help turn that school around. They refused because they weren't offered enough money. Perhaps they thought there was safety in their union numbers. Perhaps they felt obligated to all vote together as a group. But they sold out the art and the calling. Those students needed the teachers. They needed the teachers to stay and work. And work harder. and work harder. They refused and as a result, they were fired.

There is no assault on teachers. That is a generalization that is just not true. The fact is that teachers like most other professionals do more to promote or denegrate their profession than any other official or agency could ever do. Good teachers should demand that their colleagues be the best. Good teachers cannot accept mediocrity. Not now. Not when there is so much at stake. It is, after all, about the kids.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC