You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: It was probably the anthrax vaccine actually [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. It was probably the anthrax vaccine actually
That vaccine is notorious for having bad sides. The US government has asked the one current manufacturer of the vaccine to make a new one that requires less than the 6 boosters currently given, which indicates to me that they are unhappy with the current product more so than its too many boosters. There is also a post exposure vaccine like (its not a true vaccine) product for anthrax that just did get fasttracked by the FDA. It can't be a flu vaccine, because they are only given at certain times of the year. And I am very aware of what vaccines are being developed right now and I can pretty much tell you that given the shortage of people the military has they are not gonna be testing what's being developed right now. Anthrax has caused this problem in the recent past and was re worked. Of course you can argue its best not to give milatary any vaccines so they can be free to pick up the various nasty infectious diseases and bring them back to the US as well. (see a story about the military personnel spreading Leishmaniasis)
This Anthrax vaccine has actually caused quite a few problems in the military since about the first Gulf War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC