Reply #180: I said under your scenario.

[Uncle Joe]

So explain to me how he would have done it.

Again, based on the 2000 elections if he had won because all those Nader votes went to him he still would not have the house nor the senate on his side. So explain to me how he would have done it.

He was also vice president during Clinton, what did that administration do about global warming?

The Republicans were in control of Congress during the time of Kyoto, but after 2000 those dynamics change especially using your scenario, maybe not all during 2000, but the momentum shifts toward earlier Democratic control either by 2002 or 2004.

As for the polls they always shift especially after the fossil fuel corporate media propaganda war waged against scientists in general, it's the same as what they did to Acorn and to Sherrod, turning mole hills in to mountains, our outright slander, casting guilt and suspicion in order to take down greater enemies and obfuscate critical issues.

Make no mistake about it though, the continually increasing effects from global warming climate change cannot be hidden by propaganda and those polls will shift again, I just hope it's not too late.