You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #251: It was stated on Keith Olbermann's show [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-10 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #235
251. It was stated on Keith Olbermann's show
"And so—and another thing about it, they have waived these fire fees before. They waived them at my son‘s house three years ago in December. They waived them over on another road over here in out of town and saved the guy‘s house. But I know they waived them before. So, therefore, they could have waived mine.

I would have paid it. My neighbor offered to pay them. I don‘t know if it was $500 or $5,000 to spray the house down, put it out. But, no, they sprayed the fence row."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39536373/ns/msnbc_tv-countdown_with_keith_olbermann/ about 1/4 of the way down.



The homeowner, Gene Cranick, said he offered to pay whatever it would take for firefighters to put out the flames, but was told it was too late. They wouldn’t do anything to stop his house from burning.
<snip>
The counterargument is, of course, that this kind of system only works if there are consequences for opting out. For the firefighters to have put out the blaze would have opened up a big moral hazard and generated a bunch of future free-riding — a lot like how the ban on denying coverage based on preexisting conditions, paired with penalties under the individual mandate that are lower than the going premiums, would lead to folks waiting until they got sick to buy insurance.

But that analogy is not quite apt. Mr. Cranick, who has learned an incredibly expensive lesson about risk, wasn’t offering to pay the $75 fee. He was offering to pay whatever it cost to put out the fire. If an uninsured man confronted with the pressing need for a heart transplant offered to pay a year in back-premiums to an insurer to cover the operation, you’d be right to laugh at him. But imagine if that man broke out his check book to pay for the whole shebang, and hospital administrators denied him the procedure to teach him a lesson.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/248649/firefighters-watch-home-burns-daniel-foster




Oh and this should make you feel special, your opinion is shared by a pretty nasty commentator. "Radio and TV talk show host Glenn Beck defended the fire department letting Cranick's home burn down." http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39535911/ns/us_news-life
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC