You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #389: Maybe you should read it again. He wrote moderate not liberal. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-24-10 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #377
389. Maybe you should read it again. He wrote moderate not liberal.
I knew exactly what you were going to post as soon as I saw your subject line. This discussion is about active liberals, and not the inactive moderates King described in that letter. Your posting this suggests that you didn't read Kings letter or the OP. Or that you didn't understand either one. The discussion is not about third way moderates. Your accusations against liberals who are effectively taking action are misguided and insulting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC