You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #34: VNS didn't [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Febble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-17-08 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #31
34. VNS didn't
call Florida "accurately" for Gore. Their data wasn't good enough for an accurate call either way.

That's not to say Gore didn't win, he did, probably by tens of thousands of votes. But probably not by enough to show up in the exit poll, given the very sparse precinct sampling.

They happened, if you like, to be RIGHT when they called Florida for Gore. But that was because two errors cancelled out - their own precinct sampling error, and the "error" by which thousands of voters either cast votes for Buchananan that were meant for Gore, or cast votes for Gore that were never counted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC