You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #53: And that's pretty hypocritical, isn't it? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
53. And that's pretty hypocritical, isn't it?
I agree, it's the killing that's the problem, not the eating.

After I'm dead, my body's just meat, and I feel that if I'm killed by another person, that person DAMN WELL better have been hungry, and DAMN WELL better eat me.

If cannibalism is really that much more of an instinctual taboo than murder, then maybe we should prevent homicide and war by requiring all people, under penalty of death, to eat what (I mean whom) they kill. All of it - like the Indians did, no waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC