You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #11: This misses the mark for the 50-65 year old range. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-25-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
11. This misses the mark for the 50-65 year old range.
They have children, but already grown.

They've don't have student loans to pay.

It's too late for them to invest any meaningful amount of money for retirement.

On the other hand, I do think the last two proposals are actually good for the economy and for families. Child tax credits exclude millions of GLBT households (who already pay exorbitant taxes without full legal rights) and those too poor to realize any further tax credits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC