Reply #227: What was the protocol used for the zero result test you cite?

[AikidoSoul]

It's sad but true that many tests are conducted poorly. Taking samples of the ocean, considering the layering of how the oil is moving, is important to consider. You can't just go down to the waters edge and test in any location. To be considered valid, a rigid protocol must be followed or the results are completely disqualified by anyone with a brain, and certainly the courts would not consider it valid evidence. Consider the pool guy -- so what if he sent a sample to be tested. What was the chain-of-custody of the test itself? And what if he put chemicals in his own pool. It's a closed system. Look at the posts here and note that many here are skeptical of the pool owner's motives. If he has a pool that he could purposefully contaminate for hope of a BP settlement. When ocean or air testing is involved it should be done by someone who is professionally certified, and not connected to the chemical industry. Many testing laboratories are OWNED by them, and it is NOT necessary to disclose this on their websites. It is a very difficult problem for the millions of people with toxic homes and offices who hope for some justice.

By the way.... welcome to DU! :hi: