You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #77: But they were. Yes, that train has been stopped finally, but [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-29-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. But they were. Yes, that train has been stopped finally, but
the profits have already been made from foreclosures. I used to think as you do, I couldn't understand how a bank could make money from so many foreclosures, many remaining empty or being sold off at prices half what they were worth. When my friend tried to pay part of her mortgage not to get too far behind while she applied for an adjustment, they sent her money back. I couldn't believe it. She could afford a modified mortgage, but they didn't want it. They WANTED to foreclose.

I knew something was wrong then. And that's when I started reading and learning and it was hard, since I detest economics, and as Michael Moore pointed out in 'Capitalism A Love STory', they deliberately use language that we don't understand. Like 'tranches' and 'toxic assets' and 'derivitives' etc. Not words in the vocabulary of the average person. So when I read articles about this issue, it was like reading in another language. And that made me even more angry.

I felt better when MM brought that up in the movie, and asked the Wall St. guy if it was deliberately meant to confuse people, and he answered finally, 'yes'. So I began to study their made-up language so I could understand what they were doing. It gave me a headache, but nothing LIKE the headache I got from what I learned so far.

I don't blame you for not seeing how they profited. You would need to have a criminal mind to figure it out. Even people like James Galbraith had trouble seeing what was to be gained from these millions of foreclosures. But now the information about why and how they did it, is being revealed on a daily basis. I don't know why it is not being covered by the media.

But people did profit from foreclosures. If they could not have done that, there would most definitely have been fewer of them, banks taking advantage of the available programs to help people stay in their homes. But that was not the goal. See my post elsewhere in this thread. There are some links there that begin to explain the whole nasty, criminal scheme. And we so far, have seen only the tip of the iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC