Reply #33: Other information is definitely necessary.

[L Cutter]

I repeated the pertinent parts of my previous post on the chance that you had merely been careless in your reading the first time.

The only fact I need to refute your strawman is to point out, again, that it does not reflect, but rather ignores, what I said.

It is incumbent upon you to say and show when she became "employed by a government" and relate that to the chronology that I presented in a way that would demonstrate an inaccuracy on my part.