You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #29: the article is pretty much bald speculation [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. the article is pretty much bald speculation
so it is hard to comment on it one way or the other. That said, a blanket policy of writing off below water mortgages strikes me as quite unfair to those who were responsible and even more so to those who rent. Ideally, a case by case basis would be used here but the banks clearly refuse to do anything like that, so we are left with a choice of nothing or a blanket solution. Between those, I honestly think a blanket solution may be needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC