Reply #30: Don't mistake the fact that I dismiss you for an inability to debate you.

[phleshdef]

I simply don't give enough of a shit to bother writing a 5 paragraph diatribe to refute your nonsense. You are wrong from the get go anyway. A tax on a bank is a tax on a bank. Whether we tax the bankers or the bank itself has the potential to lead to those banks attempting to pass it onto the consumer. I am right on that and you are wrong. Its really that simple. A complex argument is not needed, thus I am not going to bother to create one.

It doesn't matter how the tax carried out. It can potentially be passed onto the consumer. That is irrefutable. You lack the ability to refute it. That very simple argument trumps every single thing you said. But don't worry, you will live.

That doesn't mean we shouldn't enact it. We should. We need to.

Furthermore, you (nor I) have any clue how this particular levy would be enacted to begin with. We have no details. You are just running your fucking mouth, assuming things that support your anti-Obama agenda and generally making an embarassment of yourself. Its the trademark, knee jerk reaction that is typical of the leftbagging agenda that you and certain others on this board display on a daily basis while hiding under the false premise of "dissenting".

The only thing laughable is that you actually expect me to take someone like you serious. Too bad for you. I don't take you serious. I see your agenda and its a joke to me.