You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #3: Historically, that has proven to be an accurate measure. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-04-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Historically, that has proven to be an accurate measure.
If anything (in midterms), it has been to our advantage.

but the majority of Obama's voters just started turning out in 2008

Nothing even close to the majority, but your point is still valid. Many Obama voters were first time voters.

It is, however, important to note that even their tightest LV screen still results in far more people counted as likely voters than actually turn up to vote. In this poll, it was 2/3rds of the registered voters polled... and midterms have been around 40% turnout in recent years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC