my guess is, why not adopt then lady? God knows there are plenty of kids who need good homes.
Nine years of fertility treatments?
And my guess is that she simply wanted to have her own child, which is actually pretty understandable.
My worry is that 67 does seem to be mighty late in life to become a mother. Usually, we expect that a son or daughter will be well into middle age by the time a parent dies; parental death will probably come a lot earlier in the kid's life in this case. Which doesn't seem an especially good thing...
On the other hand, there are already plenty of children who lose their parents at a young age and who are then brought up by their grandparents -- so some of the same issues already exist in that context. With an extended family to help out, I guess it could work.
On edit --
donated egg and sperm! Yikes!The article didn't mention this element, but if that was the case (and still having fertile ova at age 66
would be pretty unlikely) then the baby produced isn't really her own child, and "the will of God" -- which she claims -- had nuthin to do with it.
This is what happens when elements of the human body are made into commodities for the purchasing.
So yeah -- I'm ag'in it. :mad:
And how 'bout that picture on the BBC site... she looks a good twenty years older than any 66 year old I've ever seen. :think: