Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressman's interest in court ruling raises ire of judiciary experts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:08 AM
Original message
Congressman's interest in court ruling raises ire of judiciary experts
BY MAURICE POSSLEY

Chicago Tribune


CHICAGO - (KRT) - In an extraordinary move, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee privately demanded last month that the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago change its decision in a narcotics case because he didn't believe a drug courier got a harsh enough prison term.

Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., in a five-page letter dated June 23 to Chief Judge Joel Flaum, asserted that a June 16 decision by a three-judge appeals court panel was wrong.

He demanded "a prompt response" as to what steps Flaum would take "to rectify the panel's actions" in a case where a drug courier in a Chicago police corruption case received a 97-month prison sentence instead of the at least 120 months required by a drug-conspiracy statute.

~snip~

He sent a letter back to Sensenbrenner saying it was inappropriate to comment on a pending case. But the panel amended its ruling to cite a Supreme Court case that showed Sensenbrenner was wrong.

more:http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/nation/12112661.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. What A Sweetheart!
Man, I hope Bush ticks him off--he'd go right for the firing squad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope he is following Rush's case with as much interest
him being into maximun time for drug offenders and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sensenbrenner continues to amaze!
The man's pomposity and ego are astounding. IMO he is a repulsive enemy of freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. We should start calling him No-Sensenbrenner
It is a somewaht more accurate description of the man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Batshit crazy.
Spread the googlebomb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sure he's planning to arrest bush
And to join him in prison on consipiracy and high crimes act, where
they can fuck each other silly screaming out their joy at fucking
a drugs criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. He should be removed from office for failure to uphold,...
,...the Constitution (separation of powers). He has NO goshdamn business telling the judicial branch how to rule from the bench.

Sensenbrenner the tyrant should be booted!!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Unfortunately
The people of his district will re-elect him, because they don't have a clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. The Hill has "Dems huddle on Sensenbrenner action "
The may turn it into an ethics complaint...

snip>
Judiciary Committee Democratic staff huddled at press time yesterday to determine how, or if, to respond to the letter, which, according to the Tribune, may violate House ethics rules that prohibit communicating privately with judges on legal matters.

http://www.hillnews.com/thehill/export/TheHill/News/Frontpage/071205/brief.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-05 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. Give 'em enough rope
-- and this arrogant, power-mad, out-of-control Republican will go the way of all of 'em -- hung by his own rope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC