Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Connor Says She Is Worried About Future of Federal Judiciary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:55 PM
Original message
O'Connor Says She Is Worried About Future of Federal Judiciary
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103&sid=amecn6IvmZ0c

July 21 (Bloomberg) -- Retiring U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said she is worried about the future of the federal judiciary because of a ``climate of antipathy'' in Congress.

``I don't think I've ever seen relations as strained as they are now between the judiciary and some members of Congress, and it makes me very sad to see it,'' O'Connor said today at a judicial conference in Spokane, Washington, televised on C-SPAN.

O'Connor cited congressional efforts to restrict federal court authority to decide certain issues, criticism by some lawmakers of Supreme Court decisions that cite international law and Congress's failure to raise judicial salaries to keep pace with equivalent private-sector legal jobs.

O'Connor said efforts in Congress to restrict federal court jurisdiction to decide particular issues were ``a new approach that's worrisome.''

(end snip)

I think this judge may still have a lot to say. She might be better outside of the SC. Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. She didn't have to give her SC vote
to that dum fukk who is wrecking our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. So true. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Exactly.
She pissed and moaned about how she just had to stay on the bench in case Al Gore got elected. Yeah we're all just full of empathy for the old hag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
34. Nor did she really have to retire so soon....yeah, feeling real bad as I
saw the AP photos of her fly-fishing....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
47. Unfortunately true. It doesn't matter how much you complain, Sandra.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 11:32 AM by calimary
You helped bring this on. YOU helped bring this on. YOU PERSONALLY. YOUR vote to give it to bush over Gore opened the floodgates to this. The bad guys you speak of wouldn't have been in power, or EMPOWERED, by the then-budding juggernaut YOU approved. YOU, SINGLEHANDEDLY, could have prevented all of this. Because the more wins these assholes got, the more ill-gotten gain they racked up, the gutsier and greedier and more malevolent they grew, because there's been nothing to check them. And YOU made it happen. YOU made all of that possible.

At the moment, I don't want to hear any whining or complaining or verbal handwringing from her. She already said more than a mouthful on December 12th, 2000, thank you very much. She's a traitor to her gender, and to all reasonable, logical, independent thinkers and democracy lovers everywhere. Good riddance, Sandra. You're only in it for yourself. You're resigning because you're only in it for yourself. Fine. You will carry all of that on your conscience til the day you die. POX on you.

on edit - YAY, my star is back!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cybildisobedience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. Couldn't. Agree. More.
Thanks for stating it so passionately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Exactly - excellent post!
Hey Sandra: :nopity:

No tears for you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #47
56. double ditto...
you've said it so well. Thank you. May Sandy have pangs about her sellout FOREVER. I can't type "forever" big enough....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #47
57. Absolutely!!
Apparently, trying to determine the will of the American People was just too much trouble, it is so much easier for five people to decide who should be President.:sarcasm: I wonder, if the Judiciary were to be paid more, they might do their job and let the American People have a say in one of our elections, nah. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #47
67. Helped? You are far too kind!
SHE BROUGHT US THIS FUCKED UP MESS!

And now she has the audacity to whine about her *concerns*

That *woman* has some very very bad karma IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cureautismnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #47
72. Right on Target...
She also enabled Bush-boy to wage his grudge war, which resulted in the deaths of 100K+ innocent souls. Their blood is just as much on her hands as his. She ought to complain about not sleeping well at night - assuming she does have a conscience. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DamnYank Donating Member (93 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
52. Classic case of reaping what one sows.....
In this case, idiocy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. Bush v. Gore.Bush v. Gore.Bush v. Gore: some votes count more than others
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Hay DamnYank -
Welcome to DU!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Agree With The Sentiment
although I wouldn't have expressed it quite that way.

My first thought was, if you are so worried, why the heck are you retiring? You must have known what kind of idealogue Dubya would appoint. For that matter, you knew before Selection 2000. When you stated that you wanted to retire, but wanted a Republican to appoint your replacement, did you think they'd nominate a moderate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. She drank the KoolAid Rove prepared for her and moderate
voters. Alot of them weren't hearing or listening to the reports of Bush's psychopathology and "Bornagin-ness".

Screw her anyway for not dealing it to Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. I think she and Rehnquist
have both been suffering from a severe case of buyer's remorse. He is hanging on desperately, even though he is half-dead, and she held on all through Bush's first term, probably hoping he wouldn't get "reelected." I have heard her husband has Alzheimer's and that it is progressing rapidly, and that may be why she is finally giving up and retiring.

I actually suspect that both she and Rehnquist probably voted for Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #32
55. I don't think so. I read that when she heard Gore was winning
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 12:54 PM by barb162
Florida she said "oh no" or something to that effect. Remember her SC vote in the Gore/Bush Florida mess? SHe's got the guy in there she wants...Bush

Now Rehnquist, I don't know what is going on there. He's like the walking dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carni Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #55
68. She remarked at a cocktail party before selection 2000
That she hoped Gore didn't win because she really wanted to retire and could not with Gore as Pres.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #55
75. Yes, of course--
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 09:44 PM by tblue37
but I think she has been horrified by Bush and his fundie supporters, and that once she realized what she had done to the country, she tried to hold out long enough to get someone else elected. If her husband were not so ill, I think she would hold on longer and hope for impeachment.

Same with Rehnquist. He helped but chimp in there, but now is horrified, I think, at what chimp has done to the country and is holding out in hopes of preventing chimp from getting to name his replacement. O'Conner and Rehnquist actually believe in the separation of church and state, and they know that Bush's supporters want SC justices that will destroy that wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Yes. She was particularly responsible for destroying democracy in the US.
Along with 4 of her colleagues.

And she knows full well that what she did was immoral, illegal, unethical, partisan, and treasonous. She corrupted the law, and shamed the highest court in the land

And that is her legacy. History will not forget. Eventually, the fascists will be defeated, and O'Connor will be remembered for all time as an American traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 06:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
40. Ditto That !
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
58. Yes and we have been living in Pottersville ever since. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #58
84. Pottersville-- the Neocons' vision for the Middle Class
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 01:08 AM by Art_from_Ark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Agree With The Sentiment
...and I would have expressed it precisely that way. Well said Lord_StarFyre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clydefrand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who made the following statement? Was it DeLay or ???
O'Connor noted that some in Congress criticized the court's March 1 decision outlawing the death penalty for juvenile murderers because it cited other nations' bans on such punishment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joy Anne Donating Member (830 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. lots of Republicans
There was quite an uproar from dummies who don't realize that their insistence on "free trade" is producing the need to incorporate international law and other countries' laws into our legal system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then the little whore shouldn't have voted to crown Bush.
Rot in hell, Sandra. You have tens of thousands of lives asking you why they had to die. For eternity.

May you never sleep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. You get the gold star! Right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
73. Can't say it any better than that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Didn't she say "Oh no!" or something when she thought Gore had won?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joy Anne Donating Member (830 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. when it looked like Gore was winning,
she was overheard to complain that she wanted to retire and didn't feel free to do that unless there was a Republican in the White House. Why she waited 5 years, I have no idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawladyprof Donating Member (628 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. I think she stayed through the term she "gave"
and felt free to retire once he "won" the election in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. Of course, that second "victory" is tainted by the first...
... since he wouldn't have "won" the second time around had the first election not been stolen.

Help me out here, lawladyprof... If a bank is robbed of $100,000 and the bank robber invests the $100,000 in the stock market, are the profits from the stock investment considered legitimate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mister Mark Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. I'm not a regular defender of O'Connor but...
...there was never any confirmation that she really said that. I think it could have easily been just a rumor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #17
36. "never any confirmation?"
There were eye(ear)witnesses, Mark. She said it at a party at her house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaRa Donating Member (705 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. Fuck her
She's directly responsible for "strained" climate. She should go bury her head in shame for that shameful excuse for a legal decision. Fuck, Fuck, Fuckity Fuck HER!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. I wish she were staying.
Edited on Thu Jul-21-05 09:05 PM by JDPriestly
Why does she have to abandon us now? She was no liberal, and I often did not agree with her, but she genuinely tried to be fair, heard both sides of issues and had compassion for women. Her opinion in Casey is an example of that compassion. She will be sorely missed by all Americans of good will and we liberals will have a much less favorable Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvermachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #10
45. From what was reported...
...her husband has been in declining health for years now (Alzheimer's) and she decided to take care of him.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/palmbeach/sfl-poconnor11jul11,0,7483003.story?coll=sfla-news-palm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, She Should Have Thought abt It Before She Became a Repuke n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCRUBDASHRUB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Any chance maybe she was "forced" into retirement?
I highly doubt it, but stranger things have happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvermachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
46. Husband has Alzheimer's
...her husband has been in declining health for years now (Alzheimer's) and she decided to take care of him.

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/palmbeach/sfl-po...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommymac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
63. Sorry, no sympathy for her.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 01:41 PM by Tommymac
Tens of thousands of Americans have relatives who are suffering from alzheimers, and other diseases. Most are not able to quit their jobs to provide full time care. A lot do not have good health insurance. A lot have to be put in homes because the family cannot care for them as they would wish too.

You are putting yourself above the needs of the People once again.

Sandra, you put this heartless administration in power. I am sorry for your husband, but not for you. May you feel just one one thousandth of the suffering you have put tens upon tens of thousands of Americans through the last five years because you helped appoint this treacherous, traitorous administration in the first place.

No amount of handwringing will wipe the blood from your hands; no amount of crocodile tears will wipe the stain from your legacy.

:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Oh NOW you're worried
Thanks for installing that DIVIDING, lying, war mongering drunken coke snorting deserter and all around sorry excuse for a human being into the Oval Office.

I could care less how you feel Ms. O'Connor, not anymore.

This mess is on YOUR head.

snip...
"I don't personally think that it's a good idea to restrict freedom of speech or thought for any of our citizens, even if they are federal judges,'' O'Connor said."



No, just you just like to restrict and stop people's votes from counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maccagirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. Make bed-Sleep in it
Generations will be paying for your bad judgement Sandra Day O'Connor. Your "mea-culpa" is worthless you &*$#@!.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
20. The bitch voted for Bush in Bush v. Gore!
She should take a good look in the mirror and ask herself how much damage did the Court do to the Republic when it chose to intervene in the Florida recount.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bay Boy Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. You demean yourself
when you write like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. Nah. Let me show you how it's done.
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 04:46 AM by dbt
Sandra Day O'Connor is an accessory to rape, pure and simple. She held Lady Liberty down while Rehnny and The Boys sodomized her with their wrinkly little micropenii.

Sandra Day O'Connor laid down with bu$h and rose up with leprosy. SHE opened the door for the Plague that ravages us and now has the utter temerity to whine about a judicial climate that she helped create WITH HER WHORE'S EYES WIDE GODDAMN OPEN!

Sandra Day O'Connor's picture belongs only on a post office wall, with those of other rapists. She deserves only to burn in Hell for eternity. Sandra Day O'Connor needs to kiss my shiny metal ASS!

:grr:

PS: Welcome to The DU. Enjoy your stay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bay Boy Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. I see how it's done here
we get to call women we don't like bitchs and whores.

What do we get to call black people that we don't like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #44
50. Secretary of State n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #50
64. Ooooooh, SNAP! Made me spew Diet Mtn. Dew..........lol n/t
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 02:23 PM by AzDar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #35
60. I like your Johnny Cash avatar n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
22. and complains about the pay?
"Congress's failure to raise judicial salaries to keep pace with equivalent private-sector legal jobs"


:nopity:

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes. So they can get the lowest bidder in there to whore for the
congress and senate. What better way to control the land.

I am leaving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. leaving?
a trail of breadcrumbs would be helpful...

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #26
41. the country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
69. happy trails
be sure to check in DU once you get there.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #69
74. soitinly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #74
78. oh, and keep the guest room stocked
for .... let's see... 70K or so, just in case there's a mass exodus in the near future.

:D

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. errr,,, ummmm,,, I will see what I can do. But call first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #22
61. I have come to the conclusion that after Bush vs Gore,
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 01:28 PM by Uncle Joe
they are being paid way too much. What if we were to pass an ammendment to the constitution limiting the Supreme Court's pay to minimun wage. I wonder if the minimun wage would go up?

P.S. No doubt Congress would have to paid minimun wage also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woldnewton Donating Member (402 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. She says, in her retirement speech...
Seems to me you should stick around. As they say, "You break it, you bought it."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #25
62. The only problem with this is, they would never leave,
because they don't know or don't care to fix anything except elections, and when I use the word fix it does not mean repairing anything, more like fixing a horse race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
28. Perhaps you shouldn't have voted Dubya into office then ya traitor!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
29. She has alota karma to pay Humanity....
Bush = 911 = Iraq = entire world of terrorism

millions of lives will be spent and all their blood is on her hands as well all due to her 2000 decision against Al Gore!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
30. Why can't she just say it ?
It isn't "congress" that is the source of her "worries". It's the extreme Republican agenda that worries her. And yet this coward can't come out and say "Republican congress".

Go and retire and spend the time pondering the damage you have wrought to our country.

What bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
33. Stupid shit for brains should've
thought of that before she gave the pResidency to chimp! O'Connor can fuck off!:mad: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
37. Gee whiz, Sandy, old girl
Perhaps you should have thought about that when the SCOTUS appointed *² ..

That episode will NEVER go away, and over half the country will never forget it..

and it might help too if the SCOTUS refused to take the "obvious" issue cases that republican lawyers are always pushing.. SCOTUS does not HAVE to take any case, and yet every year they seem to be ready to interject themselves into every bullshit case they can, to help bolster the rightwing agenda..

Perhaps they should also stop schmoozing with legislators and being "buddies" with the administration..ANY adminsitration.

The public finally sees the SCOTUS for what it is.. 9 political hacks, appointed to lifetime job security on a job that assistants do most of. A job that is reward for past political favors.. Quid Pro Quo at its very core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
38. Marbury v. Madison
It's up to the courts themselves to carve out their constitutional role in governance. This supreme court suggested again and again that it was up to Congress to decide this and that rather than make the necessary decisions based upon constitutional principle. Now the corporate/fundamentalist/demagogue controlled Congress is taking them up on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
39. But she got exactly what she voted for
and now she complains?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
42. Yeah. If we're not careful...
...crazy corporatists might okay extraordinary seizures of private property under eminent domain. Or install an unelected fraud as President, or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
43. Reminder: She is not out yet.
She is technically not retiring until a replacement is in place.

That's the way I understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Yah, she can redeem herself some...
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 12:12 PM by calipendence
By getting the supremes to give Sibel Edmonds her day in the Supreme Court unfettered by administration "gag" orders after Sibel files her appeal paperwork in August!

Voting in favor of Sibel's case would be a good middle finger salute to Bush on her way out! Anything less would confirm that she's as culpable as any in putting this POS in power and helping him wreak havoc over the rest of us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
65. Yeah, Sandy, we can tell you REALLY CARE.
:eyes:

Whats-a-matter, your conscience getting to you? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pseudostar Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
66. wtf?
As far as Im concerned SDC is responsible for 20% of every messed up thing this administration does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #66
70. It is amazing that one woman had that much power.
Amerika is on it's way toward a Fascist Police State. I am wondering if I should seriously consider moving to another country in a few months before it becomes impossible to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
71. Am I missing something here?
Edited on Fri Jul-22-05 08:36 PM by Stirk
All the problems she described are a direct result of the far right attaining control of two branches of government (something for which Ms. O'Connor shares more than a little blame). They're undermining the Judiciary because it's the only branch that they don't have complete control over.

And she's going to just *hand* Bush another Supreme Court appointment, essentially ceding the third branch of government to the same wackos she's complaining about?

I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not fooled Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #71
77. yeah, and didn't she just call future sc(r)otus hanger-on Roberts...
...a "quality choice" or some such? That stealth dickhead hard-right corporatist???

Sandy, you are effing the country even in your retirement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upoceg Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-22-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
76. buyer's remorse is a bitch, eh?
If she cared so much she'd stay in office for 31/2 more years.
Even rehnquist on his deathbed has the dignity to not give it up to bushco, and baby, he's no pinnacle of judicial integrity.
i feel for her situation with her husband, but sometimes an oath to your country needs to mean something beyond the personal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
80. I despise her for her role in installing
chimpy the dictator. No amount of white wash will ever make her soul clean imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
81. fuck you sandy ho
you gave us chimp in 2000 you dickbag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
82. Maybe you shouldve stayed on then...
at least Roe would be safe. Remember who appointed this shithead to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvershadow Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
83. "O'Connor cited
"O'Connor cited congressional efforts to restrict federal court authority to decide certain issues".

I know they have done this in the past on some things, and have threatened to do it more recently, although the exact circumstances escape me. What I have always wondered, though, is how can this be constitutional? Congress makes the laws, and the courts interperet the laws. Seems to me congress doesn't have the authority to remove any laws or any court cases from the purview of the court. What about the separation of powers?

Does anyone here know the specific circumstances where congress has done this? And have there been any court challenges to this? It just seems to me to be unconstitutional on its face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC