Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AP/Yahoo: Similar Wiretap Debate 30 Years Ago (Cheney/Rumsfeld)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:26 PM
Original message
AP/Yahoo: Similar Wiretap Debate 30 Years Ago (Cheney/Rumsfeld)
Edited on Fri Feb-03-06 07:36 PM by Patsy Stone
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/ford_era_spying_1

By MARGARET EBRAHIM, Associated Press Writer
8 minutes ago

WASHINGTON - An intense debate erupted during the Ford administration over the president's powers to eavesdrop without warrants to gather foreign intelligence, according to newly disclosed government documents. George H.W. Bush, Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney are cited in the documents.

The roughly 200 pages of historic records obtained by The Associated Press reflect a remarkably similar dispute between the White House and Congress fully three decades before President Bush's acknowledgment he authorized wiretaps without warrants of some Americans in terrorism investigations.

<snip>

Some experts weren't surprised the cast of characters in this national debate remained largely unchanged over 30 years.

"People don't change their stripes," said Kenneth C. Bass a former senior Justice Department lawyer who oversaw such wiretap requests during the Carter administration.

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let me guess: the three stooges were advocating wiretapping w/o warrants.
Always the same malevolent players, a bush, cheney and rumsfeld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They've always been obsessed
with the idea of an all-powerful potentate. They were trying to make sure no powers were taken away in the Nixon aftermath and, while they were at it, just adding a little more if they could.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newscott Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. This really is all about Nixon again isn't it?
I mean over thirty years later and we can't shake the specter. Ford should never have pardonned him. Nixon should have been tried publicly and then given time.

It would have done much more good for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I agree
and yes, still about Nixon. Still about how to take over the world, starting with the US. Still, the usual suspects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I noticed the connections to the early 70's back in fall '02
It seems that 30 years has done nothing to change the way Rummy, Wolfy, Cheney, Perle and the gang view the world. It is all Team B mentality all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I ditto you.
Ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StrafingMoose Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Which leads to the conclusion


That in Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld et al's view, the "terrorists" are those punching wholes in their lie packed stories and exposing their past as crooks, and not these "islamofascists".



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Same crooks different decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you Patsy Stone
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ah and they wanted to spy on Seymour Hersh
Surprise, surprise. And I bet they are again, he and other news people.

From article:

The documents include one startling similarity to Washington's current atmosphere over disclosures of classified information by the media. Notes from a 1975 meeting between Cheney, then White House chief of staff, then-Attorney General Edward Levi and others cite the "problem" of a New York Times article by Seymour Hersh about U.S. submarines spying inside Soviet waters. Participants considered a formal FBI investigation of Hersh and the Times and searching Hersh's apartment "to go after (his) papers," the document said.

"I was surprised," Hersh said in a telephone interview Friday. "I was surprised that they didn't know I had a house and a mortgage."

One option outlined at the 1975 meeting was to "ignore the Hersh story and hope it doesn't happen again." Participants worried about "will we get hit with violating the First Amendment to the Constitution?"


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fed-up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Love Hersh's sense of humor in the article
Edited on Fri Feb-03-06 07:42 PM by fed-up
The documents include one startling similarity to Washington's current atmosphere over disclosures of classified information by the media. Notes from a 1975 meeting between Cheney, then White House chief of staff, then-Attorney General Edward Levi and others cite the "problem" of a New York Times article by Seymour Hersh about U.S. submarines spying inside Soviet waters. Participants considered a formal FBI investigation of Hersh and the Times and searching Hersh's apartment "to go after (his) papers," the document said.

"I was surprised," Hersh said in a telephone interview Friday. "I was surprised that they didn't know I had a house and a mortgage."






Gee, illegal then, and still illegal now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Cast of characters"...
Father knows best. :grr: :grr: :grr:

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Or Poppy knows best?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. I still think Poppy thinks Shrub's an idjit.
That's probably what he talks about with Bill.

"Your son's a bonehead."
"Yeah, I know. It was supposed to be Jeb."

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Right, that's WHY the FISA...grasping at straws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. The bastards have never quit, they've never given up
nor will they ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. tactics to diffuse and complicate are the same as the pictures of torture
it is the pictures not the torture that is the problem according to this admin

same statement here with Goss - it is the leaks that are the problem not the violation or illegality of what they are doing

"CIA Director Porter Goss told lawmakers this week that recent disclosures about sensitive programs were severely damaging, and he urged prosecutors to impanel a grand jury to determine "who is leaking this information." The National Security Agency earlier asked the Justice Department to open a formal leaks investigation over press reports of its terrorism wiretaps."

this is the convulted thinking and the whole way this new rw republican crooked party is - the problem is never them but the people ratting them out

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buford Pusser Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. AP: Cheney, Rumsfeld Fought for Wiretaps for foreign intel 30 yrs ago
Edited on Fri Feb-03-06 07:14 PM by Buford Pusser
Bush recently said he needed wiretapping authority because FISA was old law, remember?

So what could be the rationale for the Cheney's and Rumsfeld's identical actions, pre-FISA?

http://rawstory.com/news/2005/AP_Cheney_Rumsfeld_fought_to_impose_0203.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Oh Jeez.
Anyone think that maybe Poppy is running Junior?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Excellent. Frame it as a reprise of an old defeated policy,
which is what it is.


:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-03-06 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I'm shocked. Shocked!


Someone's been listening to Lakoff. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. Little has changed, except Cheney had hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. PNAC chickens coming home to roost, "big time."
Creeps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
casual hex Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 03:45 AM
Response to Original message
25. Team B
In another echo from the past, Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney were also involved in an earlier case of talking up non existent weapons, this time involving the Russians. Just type Team B into Google and read all about it. They argued, the reason the CIA could not detect the masses of advanced weapons some experts (for "experts" read war corporation cut-outs) said Russia had was not because these weapons did not exists, but instead because they were so advanced and clandestine that the CIA did not posses the ability to detect them.

And of course this meant there had to be be increases in military spending and further irreconcilement with the USSR.

What's that thing about not learning from history. These people are unbelievable. They are vermin, and everything they have ever done has only damaged this country and the world.

How did we let them get at the control desk again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Great post!
Thanks casual hex, and welcome to DU. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Some reading for you all on Team B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Great post
Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
29. How can they argue legality when the law was written
because of their previous actions. They knowingly broke the law! They're not arguing the law. They're arguing that they are above the law. We cannot let them get away with this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the separation of powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
30. The Armageddon Plan - Cheney/Rumsfeld 1980s
Edited on Sat Feb-04-06 09:11 AM by tanyev
At least once a year during the 1980s Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld vanished. Cheney was working diligently on Capitol Hill, as a congressman rising through the ranks of the Republican leadership. Rumsfeld, who had served as Gerald Ford's Secretary of Defense, was a hard-driving business executive in the Chicago area—where, as the head of G. D. Searle & Co., he dedicated time and energy to the success of such commercial products as Nutra-Sweet, Equal, and Metamucil. Yet for periods of three or four days at a time no one in Congress knew where Cheney was, nor could anyone at Searle locate Rumsfeld. Even their wives were in the dark; they were handed only a mysterious Washington phone number to use in case of emergency.

After leaving their day jobs Cheney and Rumsfeld usually made their way to Andrews Air Force Base, outside Washington. From there, in the middle of the night, each man—joined by a team of forty to sixty federal officials and one member of Ronald Reagan's Cabinet—slipped away to some remote location in the United States, such as a disused military base or an underground bunker. A convoy of lead-lined trucks carrying sophisticated communications equipment and other gear would head to each of the locations.

Rumsfeld and Cheney were principal actors in one of the most highly classified programs of the Reagan Administration. Under it U.S. officials furtively carried out detailed planning exercises for keeping the federal government running during and after a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. The program called for setting aside the legal rules for presidential succession in some circumstances, in favor of a secret procedure for putting in place a new "President" and his staff. The idea was to concentrate on speed, to preserve "continuity of government," and to avoid cumbersome procedures; the speaker of the House, the president pro tempore of the Senate, and the rest of Congress would play a greatly diminished role.

A few details about the effort have come to light over the years, but nothing about the way it worked or the central roles played by Cheney and Rumsfeld. The program is of particular interest today because it helps to explain the thinking and behavior of the second Bush Administration in the hours, days, and months after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Vice President Cheney urged President Bush to stay out of Washington for the rest of that day; Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld ordered his deputy Paul Wolfowitz to get out of town; Cheney himself began to move from Washington to a series of "undisclosed locations"; and other federal officials were later sent to work outside the capital, to ensure the continuity of government in case of further attacks. All these actions had their roots in the Reagan Administration's clandestine planning exercises.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0318-14.htm


Practiced for 20 years on what to do after a disaster happened. Work to prevent that disaster? Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wordie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-04-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
31. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC