Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: Surveillance Wins Some More Backers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:06 PM
Original message
Poll: Surveillance Wins Some More Backers

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1599222

Poll: Surveillance Wins Some More Backers
A New AP-Ipsos Poll Shows Bush Has Won Some Supporters for Warrantless Surveillance Program

WASHINGTON Feb 9, 2006 (AP)— President Bush's monthlong campaign to convince the public that the government's eavesdropping program is an essential anti-terrorism tool appears to have made an impact, a new AP-Ipsos poll suggests.

Some 48 percent now support the administration's program to monitor without a court warrant some U.S.-based calls with suspected links to terrorists. That's up from 42 percent last month. Half now say the administration should have to get a warrant, down from 56 percent one month ago.

...

Press secretary Scott McClellan said the White House will listen to ideas that lawmakers have about legislation, but Bush has indicated that he would resist any move that would compromise the program.

"There is a high bar to overcome on such ideas," McClellan said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ein Volk! Ein Reich! Ein Bush!
Seriously, whats wrong with that 48%? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. What's wrong is that both the media & the Democrats on TV are
pretending that this is a legitimate point of debate.

The Democrats need to reframe the question until people realize that what the pollsters are asking is, "Do you want a President or a King?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tmooses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. 48% believe liberty means less freedom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tledford Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Doubleplusgood! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wonder if they will feel the same after reading this...
Wash Times: 1) Bush is spying on American-American phone calls IN THE US; 2) Known Al Qaeda agents are running free inside US; 3) Spy program useless


It's hard to overstate the significance of this article in the Washington Times' magazine.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Can you post the link? Sounds like good stuff. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Certainly...sorry about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Cool, thanks. Here's the permanent link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
twaddler01 Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. They will slowly take away our freedom
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. lets demand from the bush crime family,the 7,000 photo's
300 hours of videotape and all documents relating to the Sept.11 attacks before any one else jumps aboard this train wreck called,"spying on Americans." If the blind and misinformed were privy to all that's out there as evidence of LIHOP/MIHOP those same Americans wouldn't be so supportive of spying..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. SHEEPLE!
The same morons who will vote Repug in November. They'd rather give up liberty, freedom, and privacy than have the miniscule threat of some terrorists actually plotting over the telephone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. With warrants. By following law - gov't has always been able to wiretap.
Just follow the law. Or adjust it so it is workable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. District Judges and Magistrate Judges
have been issuing warrants by fax for 25 years.

A friend of mine is a US District Judge - and the one week/2 months that he is the "Warrant Judge" - he has a Marshal and a fax machine at his home - whenever he is not in the court house. (The guy is also a former US Attorney and a former "Police Legal Adviser/Acting Silver Leaf Police Commander") - but he says that's way it is done for regular warrants.

He joked that for FISA duty a FISA judge can turn a warrant around (talking 2AM) as soon as he picks up the phone and walks over to the fax machine in the spare bedroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Exactly. Seems GOP still trying to "frame" this issue. Nobody doubts
the need for increased warrants. & increased surveillance. And for the two the mesh in their increasing need.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm sure the people of 1930's Germany had no problem
with Hitler's changing of their laws to keep them "safe" either. A fool and an idiot is one who will give up his freedom for there are NO GOOD reasons to do so. Nobody or no court would prevent terrorists from being spied on. So the illegal spying MEANS that people who are not terrorist suspects are being spied on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. History repeats itself.
Decades from now, a new generation of Americans will have to deal with the guilt of Bush's holocaust, just as Germans had to deal with Hitler's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Well this comes as no surprise.
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 02:29 PM by wisteria
Unless we can find a way to connect this wiretapping to peoples' everyday lives,Bush will win this just based on it being a necessary tactic in his war on terror. After all, he is our terror in chief.
I have had people say to me when I ask them if they aren't concerned about being spied on tell me they don't mind, they have nothing to hide.

Aren't there any examples of how this program has affected people adversely and perhaps changed their lives?
How about wiretapping in the past? Any examples where people were wiretapped for ridiculous reasons and it affected relationships, income etc?
Maybe, we need to emphasis what life could possible be like if this program were permitted to continue unchecked.

We hold the high ground on this issue, yet we can't get a break with the damn media on this. Oh, and some of our Washington leaders have certainly not formulated our response and attack very effectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. The whole situation is unsafe.
The more people that handle your information, the more at risk you are of injury. Your phone records and email records aren't going to Bush, they're going to a bureaucracy. So, how many people do you want reading your email?

Look at this story about bank records from the SF Chronicle today:

Some BofA clients find debit cards canceled

Numerous Bank of America customers have had their debit cards canceled and have been blocked from accessing their accounts online after an unnamed company experienced what appears to be a major security breach.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/02/09/BUGHLH55SQ1.DTL&type=tech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. BushCo ALWAYS runs the same play
First get out the talking points. In this case they are that Bush is only spying on KNOWN Al Queda and only spying on international calls. Get ALL of the BushCo media operatives to pound the shit out of the talking points without context and mix in a few really scary stories of ambiguous threats, a few pictires of rioting Muslims and mention 9/11 ad nauseum. Fill out this propaganda layer cake with an Ipsos poll. Make sure the poll that asks the question uses the word "suspected terrorists". This is a kind of mental crowbar on the pollee to answer affirmatively and skew the poll results toward BushCo. This is, in turn, fed back into the media loop and mixed with more highly suspect scary talk about LA going up in flames. It really is quite simple and very effective. It is also exactly what has been predicted by so many throughout history as the way to best nurture fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. You are exactly right Vinnie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. The DEMS need to be on the news
Hammering away at the FACT that Bush broke the law. They are letting the repukes spin this. They are trying to make it about spying, INSTEAD of the warrants. If the Dems are not willing to fight, our Country is in big trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. It's amazing what a month of well crafted LIES will do for your poll...
...numbers.

Is it just me, or has anyone else never heard of this new "AP-Ipsos" Poll? Sounds like they are reporting on the "new and improved" poll that they just created to spin this.

I mean, Where the HELL is the link to this "poll?" Or are we just supposed to "Trust them."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
20. Notice that this is from ABC news...?
We will see these kinds of "reports" from the Corporate Media while substantive articles about Bush's lawbreaking from "alternative media sources" go virtually ignored. "Polls" like this one will be pushed by the Corporate Media to persuade potential "fence sitters" that what Bush did is gaining approval from more and more of their fellow citizens.

Corporate Media will push hard to make it seem like Bush didn't really do anything wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Our local ABC affiliate is in the same building
and uses the same anchors as the local Faux news station. I wonder if this is common across the country?

Idjuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. who cares? it's still illegal. all the polls in the world won't save bush.
it's like asking the public if Michael Jackson is guilty or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. questioners
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massachusetts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. Surveillance Wins Some More Backers
Morans! (I know it's spelled rong)

When is the Mother Ship coming to get me out of here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
28. "U.S.-based calls with suspected links to terrorists" bullshit question.
That is not what the cabal is doing. They are monitoring calls without any suspects on either end of the call. This poll is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
29. These dumb bastards don't deserve the freedom they have.
Edited on Thu Feb-09-06 05:10 PM by Az_lefty
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
30. How about TV screens that watch back
According to a book I read, that's also a great way to protect society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. Do not be surprised, the average IQ of the US is a mere 100. One more
reason not to be "average"!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-09-06 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. and yet again a poll designed to get the 'right' answer.
"Should the Bush administration be required to get a warrant from a judge before monitoring phone and Internet communications between American citizens in the United States and ***suspected terrorists***, or should the government be allowed to monitor such communications without getting a warrant?"


this is NOT about 'suspected terrorists' damn it, its about a widespread and unchecked spying on americans with no oversight whatsoever. the media really has a lot to answer for in this debacle. if they were at all honest with these polls it would become apparent very swiftly that the public is not at all in favor of this wholesale domestic spying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC