|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:15 AM Original message |
WP: Press Can Be Prosecuted for Having Secret Files, U.S. Says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ayeshahaqqiqa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
1. One question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wickerman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:18 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. brilliant n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. They don't really care about classified information, most of which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:45 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. Exactly, Fear is their key. If they can make the press afraid they have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
14. and get rid of troublesome reporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rkc3 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:19 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Or better yet, what about the people (cheney among them) who |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SteppingRazor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:20 AM Response to Original message |
5. Like hell the press can be prosecuted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:44 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. To educate the youth.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
formercia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. but they have a new SCOTUS to rule otherwise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 02:13 PM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Must be "nice" to be "above" established law. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HereSince1628 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
6. Time to tamp down the press, it's getting rowdy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 03:20 PM Response to Reply #6 |
28. Good thing they can't shut everyone up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rodeodance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
7. well, folks, looks like we are not one of the "mature democracies."! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InternalDialogue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
8. All the administration-sanctioned leaking must be over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WePurrsevere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
9. IMO this falls under the 1st Amendment of the Constitution. I believe that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
10. They'd have a full-blown 1st Amendment crisis on their hands |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exiled in America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
18. So what? Have you forgotten what the SC looks like now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArbustoBuster (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 02:02 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. There's nine of them and three hundred million of us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exiled in America (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Feb-23-06 06:22 PM Response to Reply #24 |
29. Diebold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TrogL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
13. A perfect way to jail dissenting journalists - Kafka would be proud |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmdrzog (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Its been Kafka and Lewis Carrol for a long time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Roland99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. Secrecy and now the GOP are ENEMIES of Democracy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Writer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
19. Oh - so there's now no such thing as qualified privilege? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grasswire (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:57 PM Response to Original message |
20. any lurking journos here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seafan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
21. Didn't Jimmy/Jeff Gannon have *access* to an intel document re Plame? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:04 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. how about journalists who got Plame info from Libby & Cheney ? Go ahead |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressivebydesign (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
23. threatening the press, eh? bad move on their part. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Trillo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 02:16 PM Response to Original message |
26. Timing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
satya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Feb-22-06 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
27. And while secretly reclassifying formerly published documents: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC