Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guards Say Homeland Security HQ Insecure

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:36 AM
Original message
Guards Say Homeland Security HQ Insecure
March 6, 2006

WASHINGTON - The agency entrusted with protecting the U.S. homeland is having difficulty safeguarding its own headquarters, say private security guards at the complex.

The guards have taken their concerns to Congress, describing inadequate training, failed security tests and slow or confused reactions to bomb and biological threats.

For instance, when an envelope with suspicious powder was opened last fall at Homeland Security Department headquarters, guards said they watched in amazement as superiors carried it by the office of Secretary Michael Chertoff, took it outside and then shook it outside Chertoff's window without evacuating people nearby.

The scare, caused by white powder that proved to be harmless, "stands as one glaring example" of the agency's security problems, said Derrick Daniels, one of the first guards to respond to the incident.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/homeland_insecurity;_ylt=A9FJqa1KDwxE_FoAXQys0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA2Z2szazkxBHNlYwN0bQ--

They can't even keep themselves safe, how the hell are they supposed to keep anyone else safe?




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dunvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. This needs to be blasted to the "locked in fear, therefore for Bush base."
Edited on Mon Mar-06-06 06:02 AM by Dunvegan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. last Friday, cable TV was buzzing that Chertoff was going to leave?--Any
one have a follow up on this?--The story was on Raw website I think also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm just sorry
it was harmless. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but public safety is at stake... supposedly.

What morons. Remember the person who died with the real anthrax? The photographer of the Bush twins down drunk on their asses. Coincidence? Yes. I'm sure.

No one at Homeland (gag me) has a camera evidently. Oh, and the anthrax scare was just a sequel to 911, the most horrific thing to ever touch our homes.

George Bush is a Hitler wannabe. He just isn't up for the job. Hitler was on the job 24x7.
George is a slackard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. I get the impression...

... that someone already "knew" that powder was nothing but Shower to Shower personal talc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. yeah, seems that way, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. related: AP Guards tell Congress that Homeland Security HQ is insecure
http://ap.morningsun.net/pstories/20060306/3692389.shtml

The guards have taken their concerns to Congress, describing inadequate training, failed security tests and slow or confused reactions to bomb and biological threats.

For instance, when an envelope with suspicious powder was opened last fall at Homeland Security Department headquarters, guards said they watched in amazement as superiors carried it by the office of Secretary Michael Chertoff, took it outside and then shook it outside Chertoff's window without evacuating people nearby.

The scare, caused by white powder that proved to be harmless, "stands as one glaring example" of the agency's security problems, said Derrick Daniels, one of the first guards to respond to the incident.

"I had never previously been given training ... describing how to respond to a possible chemical attack," Daniels told The Associated Press. "I wouldn't feel safe nowhere on this compound as an officer."

Daniels was employed until last fall by Wackenhut Services Inc., the private security firm that guards Homeland's headquarters in a residential area of Washington. The company has been criticized previously for its work at nuclear facilities and transporting nuclear weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow. More f***** up by the day
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. It's not about security. It's about control.
Just like the drug war. It wasn't about drugs. It was about jails, money, and creating more drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-06-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. If O'Reilly were worth a damn, this would be The Most Ridiculous Item
But, we all know O'Reilly is as worthless as shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC