Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Dog Handler Facing Abu Ghraib Charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 07:46 PM
Original message
Army Dog Handler Facing Abu Ghraib Charges
HAGERSTOWN, Md. -- The court-martial of an Army dog handler charged with abusing detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq could help clarify who approved the harsh treatment that human-rights advocates say amounted to torture.

Sgt. Michael J. Smith, 24, is accused of using his unmuzzled dog to harass, threaten and assault detainees in late 2003 and early 2004 -- the same period in which guards at the prison subjected inmates to sexual humiliation and other abuses documented in widely seen photographs.

Military justice experts and civil-rights activists expect Smith's attorneys to argue that his actions, documented in some of those Abu Ghraib photos, were condoned by superiors in a chain of command stretching to the Pentagon.

Prosecutors, however, have portrayed Smith and another dog handler, Sgt. Santos A. Cardona, as rogue military policemen who made a game of trying to frighten prisoners into urinating or defecating on themselves.

Smith's trial was set to begin Monday at Fort George G. Meade, midway between Baltimore and Washington. He faces up to 29 1/2 years in prison if convicted on all 14 counts. Cardona's trial is set for May 22.

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-abu-ghraib-dog-handler,0,616735.story?coll=sns-ap-nationworld-headlines
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. HERE IS THE THUG AND HOODLUM "AT WORK"





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-12-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought they'd go further down the chain of command and ...
Edited on Sun Mar-12-06 09:59 PM by damntexdem
indict the dog.

Hey, it might play well: a dog as a scapegoat.

Rumsfeld, and his boss, should be up on charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. You beat me to it.
What about that God-damned Rumsfailed? We know he approved of the dog-terrorizing because that paperwork came up 2 years ago. It was all over the DU. Rumsfool approved it. HE should be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. WPost Detainee in Photo With Dog Was 'High-Value' Suspect


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/12/AR2006031200962_pf.html


Detainee in Photo With Dog Was 'High-Value' Suspect

By Josh White
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, March 13, 2006; A03

When Army Sgt. Michael J. Smith faces a court-martial today on charges that he used his military working dog to harass and threaten detainees, one of the prime examples of that alleged misconduct will be a photograph of Smith holding the dog just inches from the face of a detainee. It is one of the notorious images to emerge from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq.

Although officials characterized the other detainees who appeared in the Abu Ghraib photographs as common criminals and rioters, the orange-clad detainee seen cowering before the dog was different. Detainee No. 155148 was considered a high-value intelligence source suspected of having close ties to al-Qaeda. According to interviews, sworn statements from soldiers and military documents obtained by The Washington Post, Ashraf Abdullah Ahsy was at the center of a military intelligence "special project" designed to break him down, and was considered important enough that his interrogation was mentioned in a briefing to high-ranking intelligence officials at the Pentagon.

Although Ahsy -- also identified in documents by the tribal last name of al-Juhayshi -- was described without his name in an Abu Ghraib military investigation as a "high value" detainee, he has largely remained a mystery. Ahsy's story, and his months of intense interrogations, contrast with statements by U.S. officials that the images of abuse at Abu Ghraib depicted malfeasance of a few soldiers randomly selecting victims on the night shift.

Ahsy could become a central figure in Smith's trial because attorneys for the Abu Ghraib dog handlers have said that military intelligence (MI) directed the soldiers to use their animals as part of an interrogation regimen, one that top officers approved in December 2003. Unlike others implicated in the Abu Ghraib abuse, the dog handlers can point directly to approvals of the technique in question from top commanders......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-13-06 02:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Aw, Gwarsh, Folks!" sez Goofy McChimp
"There ain't no torture. Rummy done tol' me them's jest few bad apples!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC