Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LBN: Ruling Shi'ite Alliance Demands US Return Security Control to Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:14 AM
Original message
LBN: Ruling Shi'ite Alliance Demands US Return Security Control to Iraq
Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 08:16 AM by sabra

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/MAC747056.htm

RULING SHI'ITE ALLIANCE DEMANDS US RETURN SECURITY CONTROL TO IR
27 Mar 2006 13:03:04 GMT

Source: Reuters

RULING SHI'ITE ALLIANCE DEMANDS US RETURN SECURITY CONTROL TO IRAQ GOVERNMENT AFTER "MASSACRE"



Update:


http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/MAC747056.htm

Iraq ruling Shi'ites demand control over security

BAGHDAD, March 27 (Reuters) - Iraq's ruling Shi'ite Islamist Alliance bloc demanded on Monday that U.S. forces return control of security to the Iraqi government after what it called "cold-blooded" killings by troops of unarmed people in a mosque.

"The Alliance calls for a rapid restoration of (control of) security matters to the Iraqi government," Jawad al-Maliki, a senior Alliance spokesman and ally of Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, told a news conference.



Isn't this good news? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like
the Shi'tes are hitting the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. We need a new shiite based pun
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Shiite happens? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds to me like
they're requesting that the US leave . . . wasn't that one of the "stipulations" that Rummy or whomever said we would leave if it came up?

"We'll leave when they ask us to leave . . ."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. 1/29/05: US will leave if Iraqis ask: Bush
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2005/01/29/2003221422

ELECTION CAMPAIGN: For the first time, the US president promised that coalition forces would withdraw if it is asked by the new Iraqi government

AGENCIES , BAGHDAD AND WASHINGTON
Saturday, Jan 29, 2005,Page 7

US President George W. Bush said in an interview published yesterday in The New York Times that US troops would pull out of Iraq if the new leaders to be elected Sunday requested it.

The statement came as insurgents stepped up attacks against polling centers across Iraq, killing at least a dozen people, including a US Marine, in the rebel campaign to frighten Iraqis away from participating in this weekend's election.

Also, a car bomb exploded near a Baghdad police station yesterday, killing four people and injuring two others, police said.

<snip>

Asked by the daily in its 40-minute interview, conducted Thursday, if the US troops should be withdrawn if the new Iraqi administeration requested it, Bush said: "Yes, absolutely. And this is a sovereign government -- they're on their feet."

...more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. We may as well get out. We haven't stopped a damn thing since we
invaded. All our troops do is react and over-react and kill a lot innocents in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Thanks for the link. We need a countdown on the home page here.
You know, something like:

_ days _ hours since the Iraqi government asked US to withdraw our troops.

Then underneath your link to the pResident's phony promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't one of the leading Fascists (Bush, Rumsfeld, Rice) say
at one time that if the Iraqis asked for the withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, that the Fascist government of the US would comply? I am almost positive I remember that statement...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Dang, this isn't how the script reads.
After all the "sectarian violence" it was supposed to be "Shane, come back Shane!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. No that's not how the script read.
The script was we would quickly establish a stable, friendly Iraqi government and then we could leave. This, according to the NY Times report this morning concerning the five-page memo detailing Bush and Blair's conversations. What happened instead is we uncorked a new and nastier Yugoslavia (likely with al Qaeda's help). And we are losing control of the situation. It would take a much greater commitment of manpower to secure the unfortunate country. No one in our command ever thought, I know, let's trigger a civil war so that we can come in as big heroes and rescue everyone. Bad idea, even if we were that evil. Instead, hundreds of often-mutilated bodies a week are turning up, we are hunkered down in our bases, and Sunni neighborhoods are trying desperately to defend themselves against the Shia militias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. And the Sunni civilians are begging the insurgents for protection.
Which is, by my understanding, EXACTLY the result the bad guys were looking for all along.

How's the insurgency in its last throes again? Looks like first throes to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. yes, this is not the BushCo script!!---and I think we have very little
control--when all need guards just to go outside green zone, etc ect


.... What happened instead is we uncorked a new and nastier Yugoslavia (likely with al Qaeda's help). And we are losing control of the situation. It would take a much greater commitment of manpower to secure the unfortunate country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
28. we uncorked a new and nastier Yugoslavia
How prophetic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. the US will retreat to four US bases
with about 60,000 US troops and call it a withdrawal. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. That strategy will also fail ultimately, I believe, b/c
it will require ground troops to guard the bases and then those ground troops will have to go out on local search-and-destroy missions to counter the resistance attacks on the facilities.

Read how the U.S. combat troops got involved in South Vietnam. LBJ first sent in the Marines to guard an airbase at Danang, then authorized local search-and-destroy missions against the Vietcong, ad nauseum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. Yep, and they'll do it by November
just in time to make Bush look good (a withdrawal with honor, not a cut and run) and help the Repubs running for office.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. looks like it's time to bring home the troops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. updated link: Iraq minister says US, Iraqi troops killed 37
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq's security minister, a Shi'ite political ally of Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, accused U.S. and Iraqi troops on Monday of killing 37 unarmed people in an attack on a mosque complex a day earlier.

"At evening prayers, American soldiers accompanied by Iraqi troops raided the Mustafa mosque and killed 37 people," Abd al-Karim al-Enzi, minister of state for national security, said.

"They were all unarmed. Nobody fired a single shot at them (the troops). They went in, tied up the people and shot them all. They did not leave any wounded behind," he told Reuters.

more:http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060327/wl_nm/iraq_mosque_dawa_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. ...He accused US *AND* Iraqi troops?
Iraqis under the command (or 'advice') of US advisors, I take it? Just saying.. that reads weird, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. agree, this entire story is hard to piece together
Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 09:47 AM by maddezmom
here's a link from yesterday:

Iraqi police major held for death squad role
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraqi authorities on Sunday arrested a police major accused of taking part in death squads, Interior Ministry officials said.

They said Arkan al-Bawi, who works in Diyala province northeast of Baghdad, was detained after visiting the Interior Ministry.

Sunni Arabs accuse the Shi'ite-led government of sanctioning death squads, a charge the government denies.

Bawi, whose brother is the chief of police in Diyala, was accused of operating in death squads in Baquba, 65 km (40 miles) north of Baghdad.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=2188876&mesg_id=2188876

US troops arrest Iraqi govt forces, find bunker
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - U.S. troops on Sunday arrested at least 40 Iraqi Interior Ministry forces who were holding 17 foreigners in a secret bunker complex, political sources said.

A Reuters reporter who approached the bunker complex on Sunday was turned away by Shi'ite militiamen.

It was not clear who the foreigners were but the Shi'ite-led Iraqi government has launched a crackdown on Sunni foreign fighters from Arab states it accuses of carrying out suicide bombings which have killed thousands of mostly Shi'ite Iraqis.

U.S. troops last year found 173 mostly Sunni Arab prisoners held in a secret Interior Ministry bunker. They showed signs of torture and malnourishment in a scandal that embarrassed the government.

more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060326/ts_nm/iraq_bunker_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Delphinus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
38. OMG!
For what purpose did we murder 37 innocents in cold-blood??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
8. They want their civil war
Pollyanna America thinks its military is preventing a civil war. LMAO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
13. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeatherDawn Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bush said we would leave when the Iraqis asked
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
31. he said that in January 2005 - see my post #30
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
17. Our imminent surrender to Iran will be one of the most humiliating moments
Edited on Mon Mar-27-06 10:12 AM by Barrett808
...in US history.

I imagine they'll demand US backing for their nuclear program. Maybe Rumsfeld's ABB will get some contracts, though, so there's an upside for the Bush mafia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. I believe the neoconsters would rather force a world war than,...
,...allow that to happen.

Don't you? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Sure, but they're delusional
I think realpolitik is about to make a big comeback. And that means doing a deal with Iran over Iraq. Iran has played it brilliantly, and the weekend's unconscionable snafu at the Mustafa Husayniyah just plays straight into Iran's hands. Imagine million of Shi'a on strike throughout Baghdad and the South. That will reign in the neocon's delusions real fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. They'll just start bombing the f*ck outta' the alliance --> pacification,.
,...neocon-style. They're not gonna' give up control over Iraq.

Did ya' see the new LBN about the rocket attacks on Shia political parties?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Certainly a possibility, but it's not really a matter of giving up control
Because the occupying forces don't have much control, with less and less each day. US political and military control are waning, and the only freedom we have left is to negotiate the terms of our withdrawal. Thank neocon madness for painting us into this corner.

They might decide to go out in a blaze of gratuitous, petulant destruction, but out they'll be going in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I appreciate your confidence.
I guess I lost mine somewhere amongst the muck of the last five years or so. ;(

I hope "real politik", as you say, does come to fruition. I'm sick of the insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Not necessarily good news, as there will be much attendant suffering
I think the most likely possibility is that US forces will withdraw to the four megabases surrounding Baghdad. There they will brood, like crusaders in their fortresses, surrounded by people who hate them. The Iraqi Parliament, whenever it manages to meet, will invite the US to leave immediately, but delusional neo-cons will hang on until we're essentially driven out. The disposition of the Green Zone will be quite interesting, as there is the real possibility of hasty, Saigon-style evacuations.

It all hinges on the negotiations with Iran. The Persians can make life somewhat easier for the occupation, or they can make life immensely worse. It's really the only choice remaining to us, and no matter how it goes, many more Iraqis and US soldiers will die in the endgame of Bush's vanity war. It will be difficult to hide this from the American public, and we may hope this will be remembered in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. I rather dread how long this will drag out, the suffering and all.
I wonder if the removal of the neoconsters, either legally or by vote, will be enough suave to begin the road to healing and recovery in the Middle East. How will we overcome all the injustices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
18. shit meets fan
(((eek)))

How's Rummy gonna' react to this demand? Betcha' he's P-O'd!!! Neoconsters want permanent military presence in Iraq and they're NOT gonna' be happy about this demand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
19. well, good, they don't want us. Lets leave. Seems simple to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. Exactly, let's bring the troops home now!
Things are so FUBAR that there is no point in keeping troops in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
26. So, the US backs the Shia and fights/shuns the Sunni....
Then the Shiite militias, finally in power after years of repression, start killing Sunnis in retribution.

US now fighting against the Shiite militias.


Rinse, repeat.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Well, the knuckle-draggers that gave the world the Cheerleader twice
will just argue that the only good Iraqi is a dead Iraqi.

That's been the underlying supposition all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-27-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. Press briefing should be interesting tomorrow.
Didn't come up today, but it was a lively session anyway.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060327-2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
40. US asked to cede Iraq control
US asked to cede Iraq control
From: Reuters By Omar al-Ibadi and Alastair Macdonald in Baghdad
March 28, 2006
IRAQ'S ruling parties have demanded US forces cede control of security as the government investigated a raid on a Shiite mosque complex that ministers said involved "cold blooded" killings by US-led troops.

US commanders rejected the charges and said their accusers faked evidence by moving bodies of gunmen killed fighting Iraqi troops in an office compound. It was not a mosque, they said.

As Shiite militiamen fulminated over Sunday's deaths of at least 16 people in Baghdad, an al-Qaeda led group said it staged one of the bloodiest Sunni insurgent attacks in months. A suicide bomber killed 40 Iraqi army recruits in northern Iraq.
(snip)

After 24 hours of limited communication, US commanders mounted a media offensive to deny Shiite accounts of a mosque massacre and portray instead a bold and disciplined operation by US-trained Iraqi special forces that killed 16 fighters and freed a hapless Iraqi hostage being held to ransom for $US20,000 ($28,400).
(snip/...)

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,18631622-38201,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. This is it....will the * adminstration keep its word
(I mean we arlready know the answer)

But it's gotta be asked...Is the US willing to leave those mulit billion dollar bases?

The world is watching *!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. WTF I thought we were going to "stand down"
whhen the Iraqi's "stood up'. Sounds to me like that's what they want to do. If I were * I'd take advantage of this opportunity to get the f**k out of there before anybody realized what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hwmnbn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. That would be the smart thing to do .......
but you know this dumbfuck chimp will never do the smart thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Wow! "Mission accomplished" "Last throes," etc.
No civil war now -- if we refuse to leave, it's clearly them against us...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
45. Pretty soon all those forces we've trained
are going to be turning their gun barrels on us.

Gonna get ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-28-06 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #40
46. But...but...but... what about the others who weren't killed in cold blood?
I mean what's up with this damned liberal media that they don't recognize that almost 40 survived the US-led MASSACRE in the mosque? Can't we get some good news around here?

J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC