The Australian government is under pressure to pull troops out of Iraq and focus on its own turbulent backyard, after warnings that the emergency deployment of 2,000 troops to East Timor has stretched its armed forces to breaking point. In addition to the 1,400 personnel it has deployed in southern Iraq, supporting the British-led mission, Australia has troops serving in Afghanistan, the Solomon Islands, Sudan and Sinai. John Howard, the prime minister, has insisted that the Australian Defence Force is not over-stretched, a claim echoed by the top brass.
Opposition MPs and military experts have said that the defence force could be unable to respond to another flare-up in the "arc of instability" to Australia's north - such as a breakdown of law and order in Papua New Guinea, or insurrections in Vanuatu or Fiji. Robert McClelland, the shadow defence minister, demanded a rethink of priorities last week, saying that events in East Timor had underlined the need to withdraw from the Middle East and concentrate omore pressing concerns closer to home.
The Australia Defence Association said the defence force was operating at its greatest intensity since it went to Vietnam in the mid-1960s. Neil James, the lobby group's executive director, said one more serious crisis in the region "would probably be the straw that broke the force's back". But Mr Howard, who last month announced that a further 240 Australian troops would be sent to Afghanistan, has rejected the idea of withdrawing from the Middle East. He claims that Canberra's active participation in the war on terror does not conflict with his push to position Australia as the leading regional power in the South Pacific.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/06/04/waus04.xml&sSheet=/news/2006/06/04/ixnews.html