Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: In a Flu-Season Turnabout, Officials See Wealth of Vaccine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:04 AM
Original message
NYT: In a Flu-Season Turnabout, Officials See Wealth of Vaccine
In a Flu-Season Turnabout, Officials See Wealth of Vaccine
By GARDINER HARRIS
Published: October 6, 2006

WASHINGTON, Oct. 5 — After approving a fifth flu vaccine for sale, public health officials are predicting that for the first time in four years there will be abundant supplies of vaccine this season.

In all, four manufacturers are expected to make as much as 115 million doses this year, a record supply. That is up from just two manufacturers making about 61 million doses two years ago.

The turnaround is the culmination of a long effort by public health officials and vaccine manufacturers to recover from chronic flu-shot shortages that led to long lines at vaccine clinics across the United States.

For the last two years, health officials had instructed providers to give shots in the early weeks of the season only to those deemed at highest risk. Not so this year.

By last week’s end, manufacturers had already delivered 26 million doses of flu vaccines to doctors’ offices and clinics, said Curtis Allen, a spokesman for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. By the end of October, 75 million doses are expected to have been delivered, Mr. Allen said....

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/06/us/06flu.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. I heard this, along with info that the adult vacs have mercury in them.
Makes me think twice about getting a shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The form I was given with my vaccine said no thimerosal in it.
So you might check if your source uses a vaccine with no mercury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. thanks, I will... I saw it on ch. 2 or 4 news this morning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's a bunch of bullshit...
...propogated by holistic medicine advocates in order to scare people. Mercury hasn't been used in vaccines for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. You can take my shot for me.
Edited on Fri Oct-06-06 04:39 PM by mhatrw
Thimerosal (a preservative that contains mercury) in still an ingredient in many vaccines, although it is supposed to be phased out (at least from young children's vaccines) by 2008.

See: http://www.fda.gov/cber/vaccine/thimerosal.htm#t3

It's really quite unconscionable when people try to play God with someone else's health decisions, pretending they know everything when they are actually completely ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Just to add food for thought
Does anyone have any idea what the mercury load is for us New Yorkers living downwind from midwestern coal burning power plants vs. the supposed mercury load from vaccines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Injecting something into the blood is a lot different from other forms
of contamination.

You can drink a lot of milk. I would not suggest injecting it into your blood, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I found out this morning why my doctor hasn't received any vaccine
It seems the manufacturers are busy shipping flu vaccine to big box customers such as Walmart and Costco.

Hmm, get my family vaccinated in a doctor's office by the guy who has taken care of them since they were three days old, or get it done by some unknown person standing in the middle of a discount department store? What to do, what to do?

As an aside, does anyone else remember the story last year about Exxon employees whose "flu vaccine" turned out to be anything but? Instead of purchasing vaccine and having the company nurse do the injections, Exxon contracted out to an outfit that could do it cheaper. It turned out that one reason it was cheaper is that the injections contained no flu vaccine. The last I heard,people were hoping that the injections were sterile water.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
area51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Exxon & flu shots
I remember, & I think that was the Exxon facility in Baytown, TX.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. I'll get mine wherever I can
that is cheaper. If that is Walmart so be it. I'm a transplant so I must have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3waygeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. Heard the same thing on NPR
during Thursday's Morning Edition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm axiously awaiting
what this winter's Disease Of The Year is going to be. Between West Nile a few years back, SARS more recently and vaccine shortage scares, it's always good times to see what the media will hype up this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. My kids had what I thought were bad colds years ago when they
were all under 10. They were pretty miserable, but I held off calling the doctor until the morning they all woke up with red eyeballs. Turns out that the influenza can be pretty serious. No one has to hype the flu season for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Watch out for vaccine adjuvant MF59!
Make sure that your vaccines are adjuvant and mercury free. Virus adjuvant MF59 is 5% squalene, 0.5% polysorbate 80 and 0.5% sorbitan trioleate. All have been associated with both long and short term health problems when injected.

http://www.scharp.org/public/redbook/protocol/apxa2.htm

The adjuvant emulsion, MTP-PE/MF59, contains a muramyl tripeptide (MTP) linked covalently with dipalmitoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and MF59, a microfluidized oil-in-water emulsion. This emulsion, the adjuvant for the HIV-1 SF-2 rgp120, consists of 0.5% polysorbate 80 (Tween 80, polyoxyethylene sorbitan mono-oleate) and 0.5% sorbitan trioleate (Span 85, Arlacel 85) in a citrate buffer. Squalene (5%), a metabolizable lipid, constitutes the oil phase. For most studies, the preparation contains MF59 without MTP-PE.

http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/adjuvants/squalene/Jun_2006/en/index.html

Squalene alone is not an adjuvant, but emulsions of squalene with surfactants enhance the immune response when added to antigens. MF59, a proprietary adjuvant containing squalene, is included in a seasonal subunit influenza vaccine licensed by the Italian regulatory authority in 1997 and subsequently by several other countries. The vaccine contains about 10 mg of squalene per dose. Over 22 million doses have been distributed since that time. Reported rates of adverse events and local reactogenicity are not in excess of those that would be expected with other inactivated seasonal flu vaccines, suggesting that squalene in this vaccine poses no significant risk. This vaccine has been administered primarily to individuals aged 65 years and older, for whom the vaccine was licensed.

http://www.gulfwarvets.com/additive.htm

Trace amounts of the additive squalene have been found in the anthrax vaccine used to protect U.S. service members from the biological warfare agent, federal health officials have found. The finding contradicts repeated assertions by the Pentagon that squalene is not present in the vaccine.

The federal Food and Drug Administration said its results were based on tests of five lots of the vaccine. The agency did not make clear whether those lots containing squalene were used to inoculate troops during the Persian Gulf War, those receiving the vaccine since a mandatory inoculation program began in 1998, or both. The FDA also did not address potential health problems with the vaccine; agency spokeswoman Lenore Gelb declined to comment.

Squalene's safety was called into question when a 1999 Tulane University study of blood samples taken from sick gulf war veterans detected the presence of antibodies linked to the additive. Some of the samples were taken from soldiers who did not take part in the war; but all presumably received the vaccine. Previously, Congress' watchdog agency, the General Accounting Office, had reported that gulf war veterans were complaining of mysterious, undiagnosed illnesses similar to patients with auto-immune disorders. A Tennessee immunologist, Dr. Pamela B. Asa, concluded those illnesses were caused by exposure to additives in vaccines, the GAO said.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12042063&dopt=Abstract

Sorbitan Laurate and Sorbitan Trioleate were cocarcinogens in one mouse study ...

http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/18/24/06.html

In a follow-up study published earlier this year, a Tennessee immunologist confirmed the findings of the Tulane study and concluded that the mysterious illnesses suffered by Gulf War veterans could have been caused by exposure to additives in vaccines.2 This conclusion was vehemently contested by Pentagon officials, who maintained that squalene was never used in the making of the anthrax vaccine, and that even it were present, it would not cause soldiers to become sick.

As early as this March, the FDA began releasing preliminary information stating that low levels of squalene had indeed been detected in some anthrax vaccines. In a written statement delivered during congressional hearings into the safety of the anthrax vaccine on March 20, the FDA said that test results showed "squalene content was determined to be in a level of low parts-per-billion and was comparable to levels determined in three other lots of the anthrax vaccine."3

On September 28, the FDA released another report showing that trace amounts of squalene were found in five lots of the anthrax vaccine. The FDA did not make clear whether the lots that contained squalene were the same lots used to inoculate troops during the Gulf War, or whether they are being used in the current anthrax vaccination program. A spokesperson for the FDA also declined to comment on any potential health problems associated with the vaccine.

As late as this October, however, the DoD was still insisting that squalene "is not in the anthrax vaccine" and that the substance "has not been used in vaccines ... for a considerable period of time."3

http://darwin.nap.edu/books/030907178X/html/309.html

Squalene has attracted the interest of arthritis researchers because of its ability to activate the immune system nonspecifically. It was one of the constituents used in the 1970s to create the first animal models of multiple sclerosis, known as experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) (Beck et al., 1976). Squalene is one of several adjuvants (such as incomplete Freund’s adjuvant) found to induce arthritis in susceptible rat strains and has been used in the generation of animal models of arthritis (Whitehouse et al., 1974; Lorentzen, 1999). The effect is so pronounced that researchers have coined the term “squalene-induced arthritis.” After a single intraarticular injection of 50 μL squalene into Lewis (Yoshino, 1996) and Dark Agouti rats (Yoshino and Yoshino, 1994), animals experienced moderate joint inflammation by day 6, followed by more severe chronic arthritis by day 21. The inflammation was marked by joint swelling and infiltration of CD5+ and αβ+ T cells. Similarly, intradermal injection of 200 μL squalene into Dark Agouti rats produced arthritis (Lorentzen, 1999). Although the mechanisms are not fully understood, the inflammation is blocked by agents that suppress T cells (Yoshino, 1996; Sverdrup et al., 1998) . Animal studies do not report whether injection of squalene produces antisqualene antibodies.

In summary, there is limited published information about squalene toxicity. The human relevance of what has been published is unclear because of species differences in absorption. Squalene has been found to produce arthritis and neuropathology under select conditions in animals; the relevance to humans of these toxicity findings is uncertain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Send some to Canada
apparently we're short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC