Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Bush Seeks Big (more than $70 billion) Medicare and Medicaid Saving

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:27 AM
Original message
NYT: Bush Seeks Big (more than $70 billion) Medicare and Medicaid Saving

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/02/washington/02budget.html?hp&ex=1170478800&en=8ac1990ffcd863d3&ei=5094&partner=homepage

February 2, 2007


Bush Seeks Big Medicare and Medicaid Saving
By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Feb. 1 — President Bush will ask Congress in his budget next week to squeeze more than $70 billion of savings from Medicare and Medicaid over the next five years, administration officials and health care lobbyists said Thursday.

The proposals, part of a White House plan to balance the budget by 2012, set the stage for a battle with Congress over entitlement spending. Even some administration officials say they cannot imagine approval of such large cutbacks in a Congress now controlled by Democrats.

Mr. Bush is also expected to propose changes in the Children’s Health Insurance Program to sharpen its focus on low-income families. The changes could reduce federal payments to states that cover children with family incomes exceeding twice the poverty level. Under federal guidelines, a family of four is considered poor if its annual income is less than $20,650.

The child health proposal, like those for Medicare and Medicaid, is likely to touch off a fight on Capitol Hill. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and other Democrats are seeking major expansions of the children’s health program, though they have not said how they would pay for the changes.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Keep your hands off that, dimson. Everything you touch turns to shit;
don't go near Medicaid/Medicare. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. $100 billion more requested for Iraq for ONE YEAR!

One year in Iraq is $170 billion and the bastard wants to trim $70 billion over five years from the most successful government progam ever.

WASHINGTON, Feb 1 (Reuters) - President George W. Bush will request slightly more than $100 billion to cover war operations in Iraq and Afghanistan for the rest of this year and an even larger amount for fiscal 2008 that begins on Oct. 1, congressional sources said on Thursday.

<snip>

Including other items, the request will total "a little over $100 billion," according to the Senate aide. That would come on top of $70 billion Congress already approved for the wars this year.

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N01494663.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. More like for one half-year
since $70 was PREVIOUSLY approved for this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Uh, yes, that is what I posted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Sorry. My reading was insufficient.
That is what you posted, apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKNancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. No problem
I probably shouldn't have even responded. Just reading the article made me testy. You got the brunt of it. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Savings? More like robbery !
George Bush hates old people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. As usual, cuts first....tax increases from the wealthy .....never... [sigh] nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. now now, we have to fund those taxcuts for the rich somehow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, my nephew's meds will be changed again . . .
Everytime this happens, they review his case and jack up his medications again in some lame attempt to save money. Then we get to deal with him hearing voices in the garage and going off on store clerks because he thinks they said something mean to him.

Will this nightmare never end?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. War or Healthcare: the choice is clear.
100s of billions for war, or decent healthcare for senior citizens and the poor. Will our new Democratic majority frame the debate correctly? Or will they fail to connect the dots, refuse to acknowledge that these are the choices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. Let's get it from the Estate Tax or Iraq War spending instead. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. so his plan is to Diss the kids of the poor------to pay for HIS WAR



...The changes could reduce federal payments to states that cover children with family incomes exceeding twice the poverty level. Under federal guidelines, a family of four is considered poor if its annual income is less than $20,650.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. non caring WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. Taking $ from medicare to give to bush's invasions.
And if Americans allow this, then they deserve where bush is taking us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kineneb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. better: "Bush Seeks to Cut Healthcare for Poor"
subtitle: They Don't Vote for Us Anyway, So Let the Buggers Die Off"

"Let them eat cake."
Do we remember what happened after that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
17. Yup, take money from the old & infirm
they don't vote and no one listens when they complain, so theres no downside to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. Bu*h should be stripped of his wealth and possessions
and be forced to live out on the streets for the rest of his natural life with a big red "POS" tatooed on his forehead.

That fascist pig is the ugliest human being on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
19. "Savings!" Cuts to sorely-needed services are "savings."
And, of course, torture is "encouragement."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-02-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. Damn, he might as well line the poor and the aged up
alongside pits and have them shot. Why is there money for war, but no money for health?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC