Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US should weigh war on terrorism tax - Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:34 PM
Original message
US should weigh war on terrorism tax - Lieberman

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N06252236.htm


US should weigh war on terrorism tax - Lieberman

WASHINGTON, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Sen. Joseph Lieberman said on Tuesday that Congress should consider a tax to fund the U.S.-declared war on terrorism and reduce the need to cut domestic programs to pay for security spending.

A former Democrat who supports the Iraq war and backs President George W. Bush's plan to send 21,500 additional troops to Iraq, Lieberman said the proposed increase in the Pentagon's budget for next fiscal year will squeeze funding for critical domestic programs.

"I think we have to start thinking about a war on terrorism tax," the independent Connecticut lawmaker said. "I mean people keep saying we're not asking a sacrifice of anybody but our military in this war and some civilians who are working on it."

"When you put together the (Pentagon) budget and the Homeland Security budgets, we need to ask people to help us in a way that they know when they pay more it will go for their security," he said during a Senate panel hearing on the defense budget request.


:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. A War in Iraq tax would be more effective since that's where the vast majority of the $ is going
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 01:52 PM by MidwestTransplant
The WOT is cheap in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wow
that's actually something sane out of joe.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phredicles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. He doesn't appear to be suggesting rolling back all the tax cuts
for the wealthy but rather something more regressive. What a fucking right-wing tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pharaoh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. Your Right
he's a tricky SOB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
34. Yeah, that's bullshit. I'm sure it'll be hard on the middle and lower classes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
35. ignore - accidental double-post
Edited on Tue Feb-06-07 10:37 PM by kysrsoze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yah, right Joe. Gonna call it the "Freedom Fee" too!
The disgust I have for this particular Senator grows daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
64. Joe was America's Premier DRAFT DODGER in the 60's
He should take his pasty white, pimply assed body and join the fight in Iraq-Nam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, for once, I'm with Joe.
There is no faster way of ending this war than making Republicans pay for it with their 'hard-earned' money.

I know that's not Joe's intent, but I for one think it's a longer overdue idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Joe is once again playing right into Con hands on this one
Just as he's the posterboy for "bi-partisan support for Bush" on Con bills/resolutions, he will be the posterboy for the Cons' campaign ads saying "Democrats Tax Increase".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. I agree, but am skeptical until I see the details. No sales/VAT type
tax. Any tax increase should be on income/capital gains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kysrsoze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
37. What makes anybody think the costs still won't be ridiculously out of hand?
I don't see this reducing funds for the B.S. wars b/c they'll just classify all that garbage as war on terror. It's a scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
66. How about putting that tax on dimwad's uncle Bucky Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
32. Don't go there.
How about we just expire the crappy corrupt tax giveaways to the filthy rich instead? For example, the repeal of the estate tax is going to cost us 1,000,000,000,000 dollars over the first ten years (yes that is one trillion.) How about them apples? Oddly enough, that will pay for the goddamn Iraq War Crime.

budget cost of estate tax repeal: http://www.cbpp.org/pubs/estatetax.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fidgeting wildly Donating Member (335 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. STFU, Joe!
If he was serious about paying for this war that he's so high on, he would suggest rolling back the tax cuts that the wealthy have been given over the past few years. The poor are sending their sons and daughters. They shouldn't have to send their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about first getting the gov to stop BARROWING money
to pay for it. We are already spending money we don't have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrokenBeyondRepair Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. terrorist tax to finance terrorism.. brilliant
war on terror is a complete fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. Mixed feelings on this.
I hate to say it, but Lieberman is right, in essence, on this. But I wonder about his motivation. He may be trying to saddle the Dems with the reputation of raising taxes against Republican wishes, thus giving the Republicans ammo in the 2008 debate, and making the deficit seem like the Dems' fault. Or this could be a more personal strategy. There's another post with an article of how much power Lieberman has as the swing vote for control of the Senate. If he backs the Repubs, we lose the Senate, but he also loses all power he has to manipulate the Dems. This may be some sort of strategy to ingratiate himself with the Dems, either to make it harder for the Dems to dump Lieberman, or to gain some control in case the Dems do oppose him on his key threat issue--funding of the war in Iraq.

Also, I'd like to see his tax structure, if he has one. This war benefitted the rich, it should punish the rich. On the other hand, the majority of Americans voted for it, so I'm not too sympathetic to them having to pay for it.

Just my thoughts. Probably wrong, as always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. But why should I have to pay for the war in Iraq?
That war has made us less safe.

Terrorism is a threat and must be dealt with, but the threat is not in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Same reason you have to pay for the vase your kid breaks at the Pottery Barn
You told him not to run in the store, but he didn't listen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think this is good....
A limited time tax on capital gains and upper incomes will be popular with the general pop. but LOL not with Bush. But Bush will have a hard time tell people they do not have to pay for his wars...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. ah, just tax the people who want to stay in Iraq!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Got a better idea Joe, just tell your friends no more war
Guess he still thinks he's fooling people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
54. >>>>>>>>>> Ding ding ding - we've got a winner !!!
No war, no need for a tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. Better idea - dems refuse to pass military budget
Continuing resolution only with expenditures at last years level only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. How About A Tax On Public, Political Stupidity?
Think of the benefits...think of the bankruptcies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Great idea, wage that tax against the oil companies...
Exxon earned $338,000 a minute last quarter. Let them pay for the war.

The citizens of this country have already paid with the loss of loved ones and the loss of our civil rights.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. Even better, make it a tax
on DoD contractor's profits!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olddad56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
19. Benedict Lieberman. frigging turncoat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Just another excuse to take more money from those who can
least afford it. Joe, I have a better idea: Remember the Repub tax cuts? How about rescinding them, use the dollars to fight terror. You'll be ahead on the dollars and we can keep a little more in our pockets to pay bills and keep the wolf from the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. Someone should ask Sen. McCain what he thinks...
On the one hand, he's the loudest advocate for more troops. On the other hand, he's become reflexivly anti-tax, and won't support anything that might be construed as a tax increase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. Lieberman is right on this one!
From this Leftist point of view, a War Tax makes perfect sense for it will hit the American people in their pocketbooks. Let's see for how long those folks with magnetic "Support the Troops" ribbons on their cars will continue to support the war once they realize how much it is costing them.

The current system merely passes the war costs to future generations.

I realize that causing war pains to a consumer society is not Lieberman's intentions, but for one that wants to erode public support for Bush's imperial wars, a war tax can be the prescription the peace doctor ordered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. A war tax? On all of us? While the estate tax heads to zero?
I think not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. An across the board war tax will undermine support for militarism
Just as conscription will intensify and spread opposition to Bush's imperial wars, an across the board war tax will undermine support for militarism. The tax must be painful and it must be visible, not hidden like the Vietnam War tax that was disguised as telephone fees back in the 1970s.

Why should peace activists and military families be the only ones with a stake in Bush's war, on either side of the issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. How about we just end the war instead? A lot cheaper, and a lot fewer bodies
end the war - no need for the tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #42
65. You know I really hate this sort of indirect maneuver.
It reminds of the bullshit earlier this year about the draft. You do not end wars by funding wars you end wars but not funding them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. People who lose a close family member in Iraq or Afghanistan
Or a part of their body should be exempt from any such tax. They've paid enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
26. I am usually reserved in my comments.
But in this case...

Joe Lieberman is one stupid motherfucker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
27. Great idea!
If people realized that they will have to pay over $6,000 per taxpayer for the 2008 defense budget, that money would be cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayCityProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. They will have to take my house
before I pay some fucking Iraqi slaughter tax. It is bad enough that some of my money is going there already....I will be DAMNED if anymore does!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davhill Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. When you tax something you get less of it
If so the best thing to do is tax war right out of existence. A "temporary" surtax on the upper bracket income and on corporations ought to do it. When the president declares the war on terror "over" the tax is automatically reascended and the rich can get their tax cuts back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. Joe, just shut up.
Jesus H. Christ, did I read that article?

I'd NEVER pay a cent for this blood war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. Are: brain hemorrhages infectious?
maybe that explains joe's idiocy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
36. Undo the estate tax repeal and let the filthy rich pay for their
filthy war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
38. Sweet....He just committed political suicide
Buh Bye LIEberman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
40. We wouldn't want the money wasted like it has been over the last years
so we are not paying any more for wars
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-06-07 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
41. Two points
"I think we have to start thinking about a war on terrorism tax," the independent Connecticut lawmaker said. "I mean people keep saying we're not asking a sacrifice of anybody but our military in this war and some civilians who are working on it."

"When you put together the (Pentagon) budget and the Homeland Security budgets, we need to ask people to help us in a way that they know when they pay more it will go for their security," he said during a Senate panel hearing on the defense budget request."

Who is he planning to tax???


The other point is, this is a setup for the pukes to cackle, "tax and spend, tax and spend" just in time for '08...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
43. Lieberman: Congress Should Consider War On Terrorism Tax
I apologize in advance for raising anyone's blood pressure with this news. I know it certainly makes my blood boil. :mad:

'WASHINGTON -- Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., said Tuesday that Congress should consider a special tax to pay for the nation's war against terrorism.
Such a tax could help ease the squeeze that military and security spending is putting on "critical domestic programs," said Lieberman, whose support for the Iraq war has come under fire from anti-war Democrats.

Lieberman favors President George W. Bush's plan to send 21,500 more U.S. troops to Iraq.

"I think we've got to start thinking about a war-on-terrorism tax," Lieberman said during an Armed Services Committee hearing on Bush's defense spending proposals. "I mean, people keep saying that we're not asking sacrifices of anybody but our military in this war, and some civilians who are working on it."'

http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/10945979/detail.html


Don't overlook voting in the poll at the link site. 84% say 'no' so far!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. I, for one, want more of my hard-earned dollars to go to mercenaries and Halliburton.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #44
56. No doubt. Halliburton has gotta be overjoyed at QuidProJoe's idea - more funding for mercs
it's preposterous. the worst fucking idea ever.

No surprise it came from Lieberman - what a contempable piece of shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Does Israel have a special tax for their war on terra?
Because that's been going on for quite some time and it creates lots of special problems with security that are expensive to deal with.

Don't we already have a special airline tax to pay those people who sniff your shoes at the airport?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. See what he did there?
"I'm Joe Lieberman and I want to raise your taxes because I'm a democrat."

Helps feed the whole goddamned meme. I really do not like that SOB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. Actually, if it keeps us from sliding further into debt...
...it might not be a bad idea. All of this military stuff, including Iraq, should have been paid for with a tax hike, preferably on those who can afford it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. 'WOT Tax' == 'What? tax?' nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. As long as it is a profit tax for those that profit from the so-called WOT. Halliburton comes to min
d. Tax the fucking rich that proffer us this war on an abstract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #43
50. A War Tax would make the Yeller Ribbon Crowd sit up and take notice
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 01:50 PM by jpak
support the troops and all that.

If they really did this, the US would be out of I-raq within 3 months.

The War Patriots don't like putting their money where their mealy mouths iz.

Better than any nonbinding Senate resolution IMHO...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
52. It seems every single day I find a new reason to loathe this man
What an ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. QuidProJoe - seeking additional $ to fuel his war. Gotta find some way to pay for Iran, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #58
59. That's scary, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wholetruth Donating Member (41 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #43
61. Tax the terrorists
You know who I mean :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
51. Well, Holy, Holey Joe, howzabout we initiate
a "stupid senator/congressman tax"? That oughta bring in thousands of bucks a week just from Senator Lieberjoke alone, doncha think?

Jeebus, just when you think he can't get any more ridiculous......................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
53. You know, someone should counter that they'll
get the Dems onboard with this as soon as he promises to fight to repeal Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy.

We need more money for George and Joe's excellent adventure? Start there, then we'll talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
57. what a truly stupid idea
'former democrat' indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
60. Joe just starts wars. Paying for them is everyone else's responsiblity
I mean, somebody's gotta pay for Joe's next war - the War on Iran - right???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
62. Can I just write a check to KBR and Northrup Grumman?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
63. I think we should just payfor it out of Joe's Senate Salary
His and all the other warmongering motherfuckers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
67. I agree with Joe 100%... let's see how quick this ends the remaining
support for the idiocy. It's one thing to put it on the same credit card as the rest of the Bush mess... quite another to pay for it separately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC