US President George W. Bush may appreciate the sentiment, but it is unlikely that anything John Howard has to say on the timing of a US troop withdrawal from Iraq will have much impact on those jockeying to become the US Democratic Party candidate in next year's race for the White House.
As such, the Prime Minister's extraordinary foray into US politics yesterday, criticising the position taken by Democrat contender Barack Obama, is more calculated to influence the ALP and Australian voters than head off the man campaigning to become the first black president of the US.(snip)
Mr Howard seized on Mr Obama's introduction of a bill to remove US combat forces from Iraq by March 31 next year, despite the legislation having virtually no chance of becoming law under Mr Bush and the fact the US election is not due until November 2008. The Prime Minister said Mr Obama's plan would encourage those who want to destabilise and destroy Iraq, and create chaos and a victory for the terrorists to hang on and hope for an Obama election win. Mr Howard said that if he were running al-Qa'ida in Iraq, he would put a circle around March 2008 and be praying as many times as possible for a victory not only for Mr Obama but also for the Democrats.
His message remains in sync with that of Mr Bush, who announced last month that an additional 21,500 US troops would be sent to Iraq and signalled the prospect of expanding the military effort to tackle Iran and Syria head-on.
Mr Bush said the cost of accepting defeat and withdrawing from Iraq was too great to contemplate, and that to fail there would allow Islamic extremists to grow in strength, topple moderate governments, create chaos in the region, and use oil revenues to fund their ambitions. Iran would be emboldened in its pursuit of nuclear weapons, and Washington's enemies would have secured a safe haven from which to plan and launch attacks on the US people. This message is rapidly losing currency with Mr Bush's political opponents, and US voters.(snip)
Mr Rudd has already watered down Labor's position for a unilateral withdrawal, and yesterday he remained unspecific on what Labor's plans would be. He said combat troops would be withdrawn as their rotations expired, but hundreds of Australian soldiers would remain to protect our diplomats and provide security assistance to the Iraqis. Mr Rudd has promised to talk to Washington about carrying out any troop withdrawal. As such, he is being sensibly cautious.
The real danger may well prove to be for Mr Howard, as the US presidential campaign hots up and threatens to provide a reality check for the Iraq debate at home.http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21208367-601,00.html