Friday, February 16, 2007
By Joshua Brockman, Stateline.org Staff Writer
... The U.S. House is expected to vote Friday (Feb. 16) on a nonbinding resolution against Bush’s plans for a troop surge in Iraq. But the first legislative bodies in the nation to lash out at the war were the Democratic-controlled Vermont Legislature, which passed a resolution Tuesday (Feb. 13) calling for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, and the Democratic-controlled California Senate, which adopted a measure Feb. 13 against an increase in U.S. troop levels in Iraq ...
Governors are beginning to make their voices heard as well, largely to raise their concerns over the Pentagon’s heavy reliance on part-time soldiers in the National Guard, whose state-based units serve at the direction of governors until called to active duty by the president.
Although the U.S. Constitution gives federal lawmakers the power and purse strings to wage war, the unprecedented use of National Guard troops is making the four-year-old conflict a local concern for governors and state legislatures nationwide. While unable to change the execution of the war, state politicians are able to amplify pressures on Congress, which can.
The National Guard is the chief flash point between the Bush administration and governors when it comes to the war. Governors rely on Guard units in time of natural disasters, such as snowstorms or hurricanes, and communities face the loss of employees, many from vital services such as police and fire departments. Of 3,122 U.S. soldiers and Marines killed in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, 468 were from National Guard units, according to the Department of Defense and the Army National Guard ...
http://www.stateline.org/live/details/story?contentId=181267