Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was a Jefferson ancestor Jewish? -- genetic puzzle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 11:32 AM
Original message
Was a Jefferson ancestor Jewish? -- genetic puzzle
Researchers studying Thomas Jefferson's Y chromosome have found it belongs to a lineage that is rare in Europe but common in the Middle East, raising the possibility that the third president of the United States had a Jewish ancestor many generations ago.

No biological samples of Jefferson remain, but his Y chromosome, the genetic element that determines maleness, is assumed to be the same as that carried by living descendants of Field Jefferson, his paternal uncle. These relatives donated cells for an inquiry into whether Jefferson had fathered a hidden family with his slave Sally Hemings, a possibility that most historians had scoffed at.

-------

Jefferson's Y chromosome belongs to the branch designated K2, which is quite rare. It occurs in a few men in Spain and Portugal and is most common in the Middle East and eastern Africa, being carried by about 10 percent of men in Oman and Somalia, the geneticists report in the current issue of the American Journal of Physical Anthropology.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/02/28/MNGG7OCIFQ1.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps a Spanish ancestor whose family were "secret Jews"?
During the Inquisition, Ferdinand and Isabella told the Jews to convert or die, and many who converted only did for show. Eventually most retained few, if any, Jewish traditions and were essentially assimilated into the Catholic population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. I thought Jewish was a religion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's also a gene-pool reinforced by marriage restrictions
Which is why there's a Jewish "look" just as there is an Irish "look".

Obviously those tribal marriage laws aren't 100% effective, as you can see by looking at modern Israelis, whose parents and grandparents came from not only the Mid-East but from all over the European continent and Africa as well.

There's more to it, but that's the gist.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. We are all 6th cousins, or something like that, so nothing would surprise me. nt
Or maybe our consaguinity is a little more removed... but for all that there are so many billions of us now there were far fewer ancestors, and they are common ancestors to all of us.

And yes, if any of Jefferson's ancestors were Moranos -- or if someone married a willing convert ... we're all related.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am amused by all
the research that goes in to finding out whether someone has a linkage to being Jewish. What is the big deal? You either is or you ain't....I is and proud to be, but maybe George Allen need not be a tribe member :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Not exactly, it depends who you ask or is asking the question.
Edited on Wed Feb-28-07 02:40 PM by Up2Late
Because, to a Nazi, I'm Jewish (Father's side), but ask a Rabbi and I'm not. My Mother was Irish-Catholic and I was raised Roman-Catholic. I now consider myself a Buddhist.

My family tree was full of Jews, non-religious Jews and non-Jews. Unfortunately, Hitler's final solution took care of most of that "problem." :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. If you're mom is Jewish, then you are officially Jewish
But "Jewish" is one of the few areas that can be an ethnicity (or quasi-ethnicity) in addition to being a religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I'm not Jewish, but it's interesting and surprising
to think that Jewish people were influential in the founding of the country, instead of just a bunch of crusty old English WASPs and a handful of slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Up2Late Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #16
21. This might interest you then...
I think this might be how my Jewish ancestors came to Georgia before the Civil War, but I haven't researched it yet, so I don't know for sure.

<http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0798/savannah1.asp>

...Jews were an integral part of Savannah from its very foundation. The second boatload of colonists to land in Georgia, five months after James Ogelthorpe's original English settlers, was a group of 42 Jewish settlers who arrived on July 11, 1773, on a ship chartered by London's Sephardic synagogue.

The Jewish colonists thrived and in a few years numbered over 100 souls. For a period in the late 1740s, they were actually the majority settlers in the Georgia Colony....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chemical Bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. The first Jews in Rhode Island came in 1658.
The oldest synagogue in the country that still stands was built in Newport before the revolution.

http://www.tourosynagogue.org/about.php

Check out what George Washington had to say:

http://www.tourosynagogue.org/GWLetter1.php

Rhode Island was founded to assure religious freedom to all. That's why everybody else hated us. ;-)

Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #16
23. This was my family Temple
the members of who came via Charleston from Morocco:


http://www.templesinaisumter.com/


They don't show them in the pictures but each stained glass panel is dedicated to a member of my family.

This is the Temple in Charleston. My 2 greats grandfather was one of the founders of Jewish Reform and Penina Moise (mentioned in the text) was my 2 or 3 greats aunt.

http://www.kkbe.org/history.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. I am not so amused
As I suspect closet anti-Jewish stuff going on when I see articles like this. Why, for example, doesn't the article reference the major parts of his ancestry, rather than this one descendant several generations back. hmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. It sounds to me like they're looking at the Y chromosome.
The Y chromosome is a way to trace back male ancestors ad infinitum. The hitch is that you have to be male to have your ancestry traced in this way.

The flip side of this is looking at the mitochondrial DNA, which is passed down through the mother.

So you can trace your mother's mother's mother's mother, or your father's father's father (if you're a man), but tracing your mother's father or your father's mother is a challenge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. sounds like he had an African ancestor, a black one like his
slaves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. "common in the Middle East" so maybe he had an Arab ancestor
of course that's not stated in the article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who the hell cares? We're all related at some level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. going that far back . . .
It could be one of many ethnicities , from Moors, Berbers, Ethiopians, Arabs, Jews, Bantu, Roman, Carthaginian, etc. It's a pretty wide family tree for anybody, even if its just counting one side. National Geographic now has a program where you can have your own lineage traced via DNA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
martymar64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. Going that far back . . .
It could be one of many ethnicities , from Moors, Berbers, Ethiopians, Arabs, Jews, Bantu, Roman, Carthaginian, etc. It's a pretty wide family tree for anybody, even if its just counting one side. National Geographic now has a program where you can have your own lineage traced via DNA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. I thought all Christians claimed Jewish ancestry
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I hope not
that would be laughable. Christians probably claim a spiritual Jewish "heritage" via their Judeo-Christian religion, but to claim ethnic heritage would be insipid (at best). I think it has to do with the fact that Christianity comes out of the Jewish religious tradition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Not since Paul/Saul of Tarsus argued Gentiles can be Christians too.
Edited on Wed Feb-28-07 07:33 PM by Alexander
Circa 60 AD, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. CHRIST certainly claimed Jewish ancestry!
Edited on Wed Feb-28-07 11:18 PM by rocknation

rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. well, his mother *was* Jewish...
that part at least seems non-contested
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. Not the indigenous people of the Americas, forced into Christianity
by the Conquistadores, or black slaves forced into Christianity as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. Yet to believe in Christianity
one must accept Adam and Eve, no? So if you go back far enough, everyone is Jewish! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-28-07 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder why the author brings up "Jewish" when it could be
any number of Semitic ethnicities.
"Hammer said he would "hazard a guess at Sephardic Jewish ancestry" for Jefferson, although any such interpretation was highly tentative."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. Well, all I know is I was
riding a Greyhound bus back in the day through Texas, and this lovely lady got on the bus and sat down beside me. I noticed that she was distraught for some reason, and I said to her, "Excuse me but is there something wrong that I could help you with". She looked at me and said, "While I was in Texas I was wanting to make love to a Jewish cowboy".....and I looked at her and said "Mam, hello my name is Bucky Goldstein."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. A VERY distant ancestor, perhaps.
Or, perhaps, it was some conscripted Roman soldier from somewhere in the Mediterranean or Northern Africa who served in the legions in Britain, and fathered a son with a local woman. Which is really equally likely.

And it's kind of a silly question anyway; given the sheer number of ancestors one has, say, 50 or 60 generations ago (far in excess of the number of humans who've ever lived), there's almost no chance at all that anyone of European, Middle Eastern or Northern African descent DOESN'T have at least some Jewish ancestry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. It's been roughly 80 generations since year 0
Everyone has two parents, four grandparents, and eight great-grandparents.

Quite frankly, if you look at the number 2 to the eightieth, it's a little embarrassing how many cousins must have been involved in bringing me here today. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. The standard genealogists use is 30 years per generation...
so around 70, more or less--although the number of intervening generations from a given ancestor to their descendants, even in the same generation, can vary considerably; it could be as few as 60 or as many as 90 back to the year 1 AD for a given person (female lines involve more generations, generally speaking).

And even going back just 40 generations (to around 1000 AD or so) one has over a trillion ancestors (which is about 5000 times greater than the total number of humans in 1000 AD). Given that people's ancestors WEREN'T just random people from all over Europe (or Asia, or Africa), but instead were mostly German or English or Irish (or Chinese, or Inuit, or whatever), that means that most of any given person's ancestry is going to involve a tremendous amount of inbreeding (but at the same time, almost any person of English, or Irish, or French, or whatever European ethnic ancestry is probably ALSO going to be descended from Vikings, Normans, Anglo-Saxons, Magyars, Poles, Spanish Moors, Byzantine Greeks, Central Asian nomads, Goths and Vandals and Franks, and so on, because the genetic legacy of the exogamous marriages of the royalty and nobility eventually filtered down to the general population after several centuries). Go back far enough, and we're all cousins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. But the totally fascinating part
is that another Swede from the same part of Sweden my people come from (for example) is probably going to be related MANY times over... cousins hundreds of different ways... if not thousands. :P

At that point one almost BEGS for some Moorish or Mongol blood just to be less inbred. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antiimperialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
28. I hate when the media asks questions instead of answering them
Edited on Thu Mar-01-07 11:28 PM by antiimperialist
"Was a Jefferson ancestor Jewish?
Well you tell me, you dumbass newspaper. I'm the reader! Investigate, or shut up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cambie Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-01-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
30. DNA shows that we al have
fish in our ancestry if we take it back further. Too bad that most of the population never evolved far enough to understand anything Jefferson wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bosso 63 Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
34. Melungeons?
I don't know much about them, but a possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. Or his ancestor could have been Muslim....
Edited on Fri Mar-02-07 02:46 PM by Bridget Burke
But they probably went North many centuries before Mohammad was born--or even before Abraham got the Message. People have been traveling by sea for thousands of years. Even if they don't settle, sailors eagerly spread their genetic material when they hit land! From another article:

Professor Jobling told BBC News: "Finding that Jefferson's Y chromosome was one mutational step away from an Egyptian type makes you think 'crikey, could he have a relatively recent origin in the Middle East?'

"Our point is that we find, at lower frequencies, French, British and Iberian K2s and they are jolly diverse. His fits into that picture of a west European sub-population of K2."

The DNA sequences of individual K2s - including those from Europe - are quite different from one another.

This "genetic diversity" has to accumulate over time, supporting the idea that Jefferson's haplogroup is not a recent introduction into Europe.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6332545.stm

The article mentions that Jefferson claimed Welsh ancestry. There are genetic & cultural links among the sea-facing peoples of the British Isles & Europe. Some of those cultural links have been called "Celtic"--but they go back far earlier than the arrival of the Celts in the West. (Or the arrival of a small group of Celtic elite--archaeology & genetics have not proven a fullscale invasion of the British Isles.) Archaeologist Barry Cunliffe wrote Facing the Ocean: The Atlantic and Its Peoples 8000 BC-AD 1500.
www.amazon.com/Facing-Ocean-Atlantic-Peoples-BC-AD/dp/0199240191/ref=pd_bbs_sr_2/104-6060729-8091140?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1172863551&sr=1-2

As for the Middle Eastern link? In Medieval English Literature, we were told that Irish monasticism was influenced by Egyptian monasticism. Why the heck didn't I ask the professor how the Egyptians got to Ireland--or the Irish to Egypt?* They surely didn't walk. Bob Quinn's The Atlantean Irish: Ireland's Oriental & Maritime Heritage gives some possible answers. Many of his ideas would apply to Wales.
www.lilliputpress.ie/listbook.html?oid=2733139

No, the book doesn't have anything to do with Atlantis! Quinn is an inspired amateur, rather than an academic. But Barry Cunliffe (ahem, that's Sir Barrington Windsor Cunliffe, Professor of European Archaeology at Oxford) wrote the preface to this edition.

The more we know about genetics, the more complex things get. And any talk of a "pure" race is even more obvious balderdash than it ever was.
-----

* And why the heck didn't I ask why were studying translations from the Irish in an English literature course?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitty1 Donating Member (772 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
36. There was a vast trade in tin between the Phonecians and the...
Cornish people in ancient times. This trade was abundant for many years until the Romans got in on this nicely kept secret and took their share.
That mixture contributed to the people of Cornwall having an apparent Mediteranean mix to them which is evident even today.
A good portion of the population is tall and dark, and have other physical qualities like that of the Mediterranean people.
Cornwall borders on Wales in proximity.
The Ancient Cornwish language has similar roots to that of the Chaldean and Phonecian language as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-02-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. That may be the connection
It makes sense to me anyway...
Thanks for the info. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC