Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terror case collapses against Colombian

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:31 PM
Original message
Terror case collapses against Colombian
Source: Associated Press

Terror case collapses against Colombian
By MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Justice Department's terrorism case against a Colombian rebel leader ended with a mistrial Tuesday after prosecutors failed to persuade jurors that Ricardo Palmera provided material support to terrorists.

Palmera, who is better known by his nom de guerre, Simon Trinidad, was convicted Monday of helping keep three Americans hostage for years in the Colombian jungle. But jurors were deadlocked on whether Palmera provided material support to terrorists or was directly responsible for the hostage-taking.

After jurors said they remained deadlocked Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth declared a mistrial on the remaining charges.

Palmera is a senior member of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, or FARC. The force of about 12,000 fighters has battled the Colombian government for four decades and the U.S. government considers it a terrorist organization and a drug cartel.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070710/ap_on_go_ot/colombia_rebel_trial;_ylt=A9G_RzqQz5NGGbIASQCyFz4D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Three American hostages"
Funny, I would have called those captured mercenaries POWs.

They were flying a plane spraying poison on coca fields (and whatever else is nearby) when they were shot down, if I recall correctly. Tough luck, guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Absolutely right. It's the "whatever else is nearby" which has been
devastating the lives of helpless Colombian citizens. These mercenaries are hardly wandering holy men, for sure!





withered peanut crop



In this pepper field, the farmer placed a white flag
to keep the pilots from spraying his licit crops.
Nonetheless, his peppers were sprayed and destroyed.



This stream was sprayed in violation of Colombian law.







In violation of Colombian law, the fumigation has destroyed
animal pastures and fish ponds. The Roundup sold in the US
explicitly warns against spraying into water or anywhere animals
may feed. The "Roundup Ultra" used in Colombia is even stronger
and deadlier than what is sold in the US.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks for the photos, Judi Lynn (always worth a thousand words, or
Bacchus39's 12-word "hit and run" posts).

If you had seen your mother or father, or other family members, or neighbors, or union leaders, or local teachers or elders, chainsawed by Uribe's fascist paramilitaries, and their parts thrown into mass graves, or you had seen your corn crop or your animals or your kids sprayed by Super-Roundup, time and again, to drive you from your land and into urban squalor, where you are lucky to get some slave labor job of 14 hour a day, 7 days a week, repetitive misery at pittance wages, you, too, might be tempted to take up arms. I've often thought about these armed FARC leftists, and what must drive them into exile in the jungle, for what has to be a very hard life. Most people wouldn't choose this. Who wants to be hunted? Who wants to live hand to mouth fighting the well-armed (supported by billions in US tax dollars) Colombian military and their spinoffs, the rightwing paramilitaries who torture and chainsaw their captives? No doubt some have bad motives. No doubt some have become corrupt and uncaring, living a life of armed rebellion. But desperation and rage at what they've seen, of rightwing horror and oppression, more than likely motivates most FARC guerrillas. They are dinosaurs, like their rightwing paramilitary counterparts, and like the Bushite/Uribe murderous "war on drugs". Violence breed violence. In only rare cases has violence resulted in BETTER conditions. And the rest of Latin American has learned this lesson, and are creating a leftist revolution peacefully through democratic institutions (--with leftist governments elected in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil, Chile and Nicaragua, and strong leftist movements in Peru, Paraguay and Mexico, likely to win future elections). But it is nevertheless understandable what may drive young people in particular into violent revolution. Also, it has been well documented by human rights groups and unions that the bulk of the deaths in the Colombian civil war (in the 80% range) have been caused by the rightwing paramilitaries and the rightwing government, not by FARC. And the death toll isn't the whole toll. The "war on drug" devastation to small peasant farmers, including DNA damage to people and animals, ruination of farmland and water sources, and the dislocation of tens of thousands of poor people driven from rural areas (so their lands can be taken over by the big drug lords who are protected by the government, and by Monsanto and Chiquita Banana and Drummond, and by Bush "free trade" biofuel producers) are a huge additional impact of Bush/US military aid to Colombia.

That child's drawing that Judi Lynn posted above says it all. Children don't lie. The U.S. brings death and devastation. Torture, murder and the poisoning of everything is a our name. That helicopter and that airplane dropping toxic pesticides on all living things were paid for by the U.S. of A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Ah, Yes....
and another continent hates our guts now. What is Gonzo's Justice Department now - 0 for 600 or so? Nice job, bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bacchus39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-10-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. tough luck for Trinidad too on his conviction
talk about a mercenary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-11-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. Congress Should Reject Trade Agreement With Colombia
Congress Should Reject Trade Agreement With Colombia
Posted July 11, 2007 | 01:23 PM (EST)


~snip~
The word "paramilitary" is a euphemism. In the 1980s, when the Reagan administration was supporting the mass murder of tens of thousands of civilians in countries like Guatemala and El Salvador, these organizations were called "death squads."
(snip)

One of the most sinister revelations has been the government's role in the murder of trade unionists, which continues despite the incomplete demobilization. Last year 72 trade unionists were killed, making Colombia the most dangerous place in the world by far for a union activist. According to witnesses co-operating with the Colombian Attorney General's office, the government's intelligence services provided names and security details of union activists to the death squads. The former chief of the intelligence service - who managed Uribe's 2002 presidential campaign in the state of Magdalena - has been arrested and charged with conspiring with the death squads to kill union leaders and others.

Over the past three decades the United States has greatly expanded trade with -- and moved factories to -- countries where workers have limited rights to form unions or bargain collectively. One of the main purposes of such commercial agreements as the NAFTA and the WTO has been to reduce wages here by throwing US workers into competition with their much lower-paid counterparts throughout the world. Partly as a result of these policies, the average real wage in the United States has hardly moved over the last 30 years, despite productivity increases every year. These "free trade" agreements have therefore become increasingly unpopular, and this issue helped tip the balance of Congress to the Democrats in the 2006 election.

These agreements have also lost popularity in Latin America, where the governments of Ecuador and Bolivia - accountable to their voters - cannot sign the kind of agreement that Colombia and Peru are willing to accept. All four countries currently have access to US markets under the ATPDEA (Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act). But some Republicans in Congress have been threatening that duty-free access in order to punish Ecuador and Bolivia for not signing a "free trade" agreement, and for not being sufficiently subservient to foreign investors. This kind of bullying will not force these governments to ignore their electoral mandates and will only increase resentment against the United States in the region.

Congress should stop using the ATPDEA preferences as a political weapon against Ecuador and Bolivia, and reject the agreements with Colombia and Peru. Approving the Colombian agreement would send an especially chilling message to the world that Washington is seeking access to cheap and repressed labor - and doesn't care how much violence is used to terrorize workers into submission.
(snip/)

http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/postglobal/needtoknow/2007/07/congress_should_reject_trade_a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC