Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq Embassy Cost Rises $144 Million Amid Project Delays

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 10:41 PM
Original message
Iraq Embassy Cost Rises $144 Million Amid Project Delays
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 10:42 PM by RamboLiberal
Source: Washington Post

The massive U.S. embassy under construction in Baghdad could cost $144 million more than projected and will open months behind schedule because of poor planning, shoddy workmanship, internal disputes and last-minute changes sought by State Department officials, according to U.S. officials and a department document provided to Congress.

The embassy, which will be the largest U.S. diplomatic mission in the world, was budgeted at $592 million. The core project was supposed to have been completed by last month, but the timetable has slipped so much that the State Department has sought and received permission from the Iraqi government to allow about 2,000 non-Iraqi construction employees to stay in the country until March.

Two key office buildings, including the new chancery, will not be finished until early 2009, according to the document.

Completing the sprawling, 21-building compound is viewed by some officials as a key element of building a sustainable, long-term diplomatic presence in Baghdad. It will allow U.S. personnel to vacate their offices in Saddam Hussein's former Republican Palace and consolidate operations that are spread across the Green Zone. The new facility is also intended to provide diplomats with housing that is better protected to withstand mortar and rocket attacks.

The growing price tag and delayed opening have alarmed members of Congress, some of whom regard the troubled project as the latest in a series of State Department management problems in Iraq. The department has been criticized for failing to send enough reconstruction specialists to assist U.S. forces in Baghdad and for not providing adequate oversight of its principal private security force, Blackwater USA, whose personnel have been accused of using excessive force to protect U.S. diplomats.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/06/AR2007100601450.html?hpid=topnews



Another Bush and Repuke White Elephant! Democrats it's time to cut off the F'ing money for this boondoggle!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blayne Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I was under the impression that
the $592 million cost was a fixed cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there even one person in America who would find this surprising? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Theduckno2 Donating Member (905 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. It is not surprising to me.
"Completing the sprawling, 21-building compound is viewed by some officials as a key element of building a sustainable, long-term diplomatic presence in Baghdad. It will allow U.S. personnel to vacate their offices in Saddam Hussein's former Republican Palace...".

It is a difficult thing to be a viceroy from such humble digs.

If there were plenty of justice in the world and Bush were convicted of war crimes, his place of life incarceration should be the vacated embassy grounds "Bush's Palace" in Baghdad. He while there would be reminded of the shoddiness and poor workmanship of his Presidency as he forever roams the empty halls of his delusional ambitions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some spokesman said a few days ago, don't worry, it's a fixed 592m cost.
That spokesman must have taken us all for complete morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iaviate1 Donating Member (289 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-06-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. What have we become?
Edited on Sat Oct-06-07 11:13 PM by iaviate1
We can't even build a well-funded complex without accusations of "poor planning, shoddy workmanship, internal disputes..." We despirately need somebody who will challenge America to become it's best. There is no honor in what we're doing and it shows by the half-assed job our civilian leadership is doing. I believe this country is full of the hardest working and most competent people on the face of this Earth - we just need people who will let us shine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. What's another $144 Million? The payoffs have to be funneled somehow. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-07-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
7. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC