Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Birth-Control Foe To Run Office on Family Planning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:41 PM
Original message
Birth-Control Foe To Run Office on Family Planning
Source: Washington Post

Wednesday, October 17, 2007; Page A15

The Bush administration again has appointed a chief of family planning programs at the Department of Health and Human Services who has been critical of contraception.

Susan Orr, most recently an associate commissioner in the Administration for Children and Families, was appointed Monday to be acting deputy assistant secretary for population affairs. She will oversee $283 million in annual grants to provide low-income families and others with contraceptive services, counseling and preventive screenings.

In a 2001 article in The Washington Post, Orr applauded a Bush proposal to stop requiring all health insurance plans for federal employees to cover a broad range of birth control. "We're quite pleased, because fertility is not a disease," said Orr, then an official with the Family Research Council.

Critics panned the appointment last year of Eric Keroack, a physician who worked at a Christian pregnancy-counseling organization that opposed the use of birth control. He resigned in March. "We have another appointment that just truly politicizes family planning," said Mary Jane Gallagher, president of the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association. "The last time I looked, both Republicans and Democrats used contraception in America."...

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101601762.html?nav=most_emailed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there any reason to be surprised?
Sadly, no. This will go unnoticed & unremarked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is it mysogyny or are they determined to overpopulate the planet
to bring on a natural armageddon?

I cannot stand these opponents of contraception. Contraception is responsible behavior. Bush's grandmother must be spinning in her grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Naw, just religious stupidity.
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 08:21 AM by Odin2005
I've never really believed the notion that this BS is to do with some "subconscious desire to subjugate women", it has always seemed like crap pop sociology of the same kind as the "tall buildings are phallic symbols" nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Misogyny. They cannot abide the idea that a woman might
control her own body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. With any luck, she'll get knocked up and have to spend more time with her family
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Of course, if she does that, but doesn't have adequate health
insurance, it will be all her fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is just so bizarrely typical. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. A new low
....:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. can we have an atheist appointed to head of the faith-based initiatives program?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Aghh. The idiocy never stops...
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-17-07 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this the same nut job who says having pre-marital sex "does damage to the brain?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, I think that was the asshole that just resigned.
Edited on Thu Oct-18-07 12:38 AM by Kool Kitty
Keroack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You're right. This new nut job called contraceptives part of the "Culture Of Death"
A few choice tidbits about this latest effluent from bush's Unqualified Crony Assembly Line (from http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/17/susan-orr/):


– In a 2001, Orr embraced a Bush administration proposal to “stop requiring all health insurance plans for federal employees” to cover a broad range of birth control. “We’re quite pleased, because fertility is not a disease,” said Orr.

– At the 2001 Conservative Political Action Conference, Orr cheered Bush’s endorsement of Reagan’s “Mexico City Policy,” which required NGOs receiving federal funds to “neither perform nor actively promote abortion as a method of family planning in other nations.” Orr said that it was proof Bush was pro-life “in his heart.”

– In a 2000 Weekly Standard article, Orr railed against requiring health insurance plans to cover contraceptives. “It’s not about choice,” said Orr. “It’s not about health care. It’s about making everyone collaborators with the culture of death.”

– Orr authored a paper in 2000 titled, “Real Women Stay Married.” In it she wrote that women should “think about focusing our eyes, not upon ourselves, but upon the families we form through marriage.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmylavin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Real Women Stay Married?
Even if the "real men" they're married to beat them, or sleep around.

These people show SUCH a disconnect from the larger picture of reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
10. We need activists to go through these people's garbage and out them for using birth control
while denying others the same right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. Will her office be next to the veterinarian who runs "Women's Health"?
Or has that person been there and gone by now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
15. Huh, I just contracted out the protection of my hen house to a wolf...
think it's a good idea?

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. First abortion, now birth-control. Just like they planned all along!
Pro-lifers are LIARS and FRAUDS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbackjon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-18-07 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
19. Shouldn't she be at home with her kids?
Dems - this is something worth blocking!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC