Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

24,000 civilian Iraqi deaths in 2007

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 06:34 AM
Original message
24,000 civilian Iraqi deaths in 2007
Source: The Daily Telegraph

US-LED coalition and paramilitary forces in Iraq were responsible for some 24,000 violent civilian deaths in 2007, according to an independent group monitoring casualties in the war-ravaged country.

The Iraq Body Count (IBC) whose figures are tallied from media reports, morgue and hospital data, non-governmental and other sources, said in a report that there were between 22,586 and 24,159 violent civilian deaths in Iraq during the past year.

"Perhaps the most accurate description of the security situation for Iraqi civilians in the past year is that it was less bad than if the worst of the late 2006 levels had been sustained throughout 2007," the group said in a statement.

The IBC lamented security that "remains at an abysmally low level" in much of the country.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22999215-5001028,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. In all fairness I don't see how those killed by suicide bombers and
militias are our fault except to the extent that we back certain militias.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are there as a consequence of the war---therefore they do count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Fair enough, but I think it would be more appropriate to blame the government
as a whole and not the military personnel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Perhaps we should blame Bush/Cheney/Rummy and NeoCons along with Congress... for the Invasion.
That might be the most appropriate place for the Blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Really? - and what if the USA had just stayed home?
.
.
.
??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's a different thing to blame the government than to blame the soldiers
I distinguish between policies and the men on the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Where do you draw the line?
At what rank does responsibility vanish?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Many are killed by AQ, the invited guests of some Sunni tribes but the tables have turned
In fact, the last "audio" tape from OBL was trying to convince Sunni's in Iraq to stop attacking AQ. I don't think they are going to give much credence to the ingrate
How many of the body counts included headless bodies found tied up and dumped in shallow graves or in ditches?

http://icasualties.org/oif/
Amnesty international mentions far higher death tolls in areas where the US has no presence. Guess it's because there is no oil in these other countries or
the Chinese oil companies have a status quo set up with those shit hole countries leaders to supply weapons to keep the them in power.

Things are worse in Venezuela when it comes to death squads. The first day of 2008 they had 63 murders ( assassinations)


http://vzlanpolitics.blogspot.com/2007/12/33-per-day.html


http://www.noticias24.com/actualidad/?p=10815


http://noticias.eluniversal.com/2007/12/28/sucgc_art_ministro-del-interio_653559.shtml


sure is nice we have a monopoly on all that Iraqi oil
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3121728
/sarc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So, how long have you been a mouthpiece for the opposition?
I'd not try to peddle that obvious bs here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Is that you Hugo ?
Amnesty international is an opposition group ?
wtf!
Bet you think Kucinich is going to beat out chickenhawk Hillary!

Your talking out of yer azz

lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No, it's a person with a brain. Please continue to post
this cr@p. In fact, speed it up and save us all some time. lol

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. not willing to take the bet ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. al Qaeda? Good one.
There are an estimated 3-5000 members of al Qaeda in Iraq. In a country of 24 million.

Either they've been very, very busy, or your country is selling you a line. And you've sucked it up like a good Murkin.

How does your link even start to refute the fact that the US has a complete monopoly on Iraqi oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. the "missing" ammo
Edited on Thu Jan-03-08 10:18 AM by RedSock
Also:

Maybe the hundreds of tons of weapons and ammo that the US just happened to leave unguarded over the past few years to be stolen and then used against US troops = a bit o' fault.

EDIT: in October 2004, it was reported that "Nearly 380 tons of strong conventional weapons were recently stolen from a facility in Iraq ... The Bush administration is being blamed for faulty security at the compound, which had no obvious security present ..."

And there have been other incidents as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. You must be kidding.
We invade a country, fail to provide security, and we're not to blame? That is pure unadulterated denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sultana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Horrid
How would American react if those we our citizens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-02-08 11:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. The IBC methodology is guaranteed to seriously underestimate civilian casualities
Edited on Wed Jan-02-08 11:26 PM by struggle4progress
so the true number is certainly much higher

Iraq Body Count: “A Very Misleading Exercise”
By Media Lens
05 October 2007

The mainstream media are continuing to use figures provided by the website Iraq Body Count (IBC) to sell the public a number for total post-invasion deaths of Iraqis that is perhaps 5-10% of the true death toll ...

“A UK-based polling agency, Opinion Research Business (ORB), said it had extrapolated the figure by asking a random sample of 1,461 Iraqi adults how many people living in their household had died as a result of the violence rather than from natural causes.

“The results lend weight to a 2006 survey of Iraqi households published by the Lancet, which suggested that about 655,000 Iraqi deaths were ‘a consequence of the war’.

“However, these estimates are both far higher than the running total of reported civilian deaths maintained by the campaign group Iraq Body Count which puts the figure at between 71,000 and 78,000.”
(BBC Online, ‘US contractors in Iraq shootout,’ September 17, 2007) ...

http://www.countercurrents.org/lens051007.htm

<edit: add MediaLens link>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
14. sickening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magleetis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. The US
has created an Arab drain in Iraq. I think that was part of the plan all along. It is a lot easier to kill them than to let them into the US, huh George?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-03-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. This has to be waaaaaaay too low
I am sorry, but this is nonsense. I have heard reliable reports that the total for Operation I'm A War President is more than a million. 24,000 for this year wouldn't do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC