For instance, Uribe's bad faith (probably instigated by Donald Rumsfeld--see WaPo 12/1/07*) in abruptly ending the first hostage negotiation, blaming that on Hugo Chavez (with a lame excuse), grabbing the FARC negotiators who were in transit to Caracas with "proof of life" documentation, trying to claim credit for obtaining the "proof of life" (quickly contradicted by the hostages' families and world leaders like the president of France, who credited Chavez, and urged him to continue his efforts), and likely located the child Emmanuel from info in the seized "proof of life" documents (or someone in the Colombian child care system ratted Emmanuel out to the government--or both). Uribe and the Bushites have done nothing but try to sabotage these negotiations, and Uribe's initial invitation to Chavez to try to negotiate hostage releases was more than likely a trap for Chavez (which Chavez evaded). (See Rumsfeld's first paragraph.*)
That this child has been reunited with his mother is no credit to Uribe or his puppetmasters in Washington. The hostages are just pawns in their war games, and in particular in Rumsfeld's plan to instigate Oil War II in South America*. This is not to excuse FARC for separating mother and child in the first place (though his surreptitious placement in a foster care home in Bogota was probably to insure his safety and welfare--jungle war camps, and guerrilla forces under frequent attack, and often on the move, being the only alternative, from FARC's point of view). According to Amnesty International**, the Colombian government security forces and their rightwing paramilitary associates have so far exceeded FARC (92% to 2%) in violence against non-combatants (such as union leaders) that FARC's activities really must be understood in that light. In Colombia, the government and its paramilitaries have murdered thousands of union leaders, peasant farmers, political leftists, human rights workers and journalists. They simply do not permit normal democratic activity to occur. So what can people who see their leaders and their brothers and sisters murdered for innocent activities--often with horrible torture--do? Some have taken to the jungle as an armed force, and have been fighting this dreadful fascist government for 30 years. Others have courageously continued to try to create civil democracy, at risk of their lives. This is the story that our war profiteering corporate news monopolies and their sources--the Bush CIA and local fascists--don't tell you, and have actively suppressed: why FARC exists. There is no such leftist guerrilla army in countries that have held transparent elections (for instance, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Argentina, also Brazil, Uruguay, Argentina and Chile--with Venezuela exceeding them all for transparency and fairness).
In a free and open society, in a democracy where people can organize, speak out and vote, without fear of government-sponsored rightwing death squads killing them, and also without fear of corporate-controlled voting machines stealing their votes, and in a society that consequently seeks social justice, because it is ruled by the majority, that is, in a county in which the people are able to correct the course of the ship of state when it goes awry, there is no need for violent conflict, and lawless elements who engage in it (such as the rightwing coup plotters in Venezuela and Bolivia, and those in Colombia plotting against their democratic neighbors) deserve to be caught and punished. Not funded with billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars from the Bush Junta--as is the case with the lawless government of Colombia.
I don't condone these 2% of violent incidents that FARC has apparently committed, even if they were somewhat justifiable (or at least understandable) frontier justice (--AI states that FARC was not likely targeting innocents, but rather people who were colluding with the rightwing death squads). Nor, of course, do I condone kidnapping. But that really is not the issue in a 30 year civil war. The issue is how to stop it. And with the government committing 92% of the murders of innocent parties, the way to stop it is for the U.S. to withdraw all forces and funds, now--and let the good governments of South America broker a peace. We are feeding this war, as we did in Vietnam, and that is where it is heading--to mass U.S. intervention and slaughter, in this case on behalf of Occidental Petroleum, Exxon Mobile, the World Bank and associated global corporate predators.
Read Donald Rumsfeld's PNAC II: South America*, in the Washington Post, published the very weekend that the first hostage release negotiated by Chavez (the bigger one) was to occur (12/1/07), and tell me how I have read this wrong. Chavez wants peace in Colombia--as do all good people--and Rumsfeld & Co. are desperate to prevent peace from being negotiated, and are quite anxious to widen this war while Bush is still in office.
------------------
**AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL REPORT
"...cases in which clear evidence of responsibility is available indicates that in 2005 around 49 per cent of human rights abuses against trade unionists were committed by paramilitaries and some 43 per cent directly by the security forces. Just over 2 per cent were attributable to guerrilla forces (primarily the FARC and ELN) and just over 4 per cent to criminally-motivated actions."
http://www.amnesty.org/en/alfresco_asset/26e626d7-a2c0-11dc-8d74-6f45f39984e5/amr230012007en.html-------------------
*"The Smart Way to Beat Tyrants Like Chávez," by Donald Rumsfeld, Washington Post, 12/1/07
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/30/AR2007113001800.html 
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
