Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conflict of interest tanks worker's case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:53 PM
Original message
Conflict of interest tanks worker's case
Source: Associated Press

For years, Braxton Berkley was exposed to chemicals while helping build top-secret military planes at Lockheed Martin's storied Skunk Works plant. He says those chemicals made him ill — but his case reached a dead end at the state's highest court.


The California Supreme Court has refused to hear his appeal not on legal merits, but because four of the seven justices cited a conflict of interest because they controlled stock in oil companies that provided some of the solvents at issue in the case.

"It's unfair and I am very disgusted with the courts," said Berkley, who worked at Lockheed during the height of the Cold War and is now a minister in Pacoima, Calif. He suffers from diabetes and arthritis that he says were caused by the chemicals. "A lot of my friends died because of the toxic chemicals we handled."

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080114/ap_on_re_us/supreme_court_conflict
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, oil companies are now exempt from laws...
i guess i'm not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is unfair. There has to be a way for Berkley to get his case heard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just about the time i think i've heard it all....
stuff like this makes me wanna :puke:. 'The rich man does the dancing while the poor man pays the band'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. But Scalia could not excuse himself for conflict of interest when he is Cheney's hunting partner
They are not required to excuse themselves. They chose to do so just to sabatage this case..I would bet any amount of money they are all Republican judges...It is very difficult to find a Democrat that would behave in such a manner..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-15-08 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. Money talks.
The California Supreme is hopelessly compromised.

Hey, Californians! How about forcing the justices to divest, or face impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC