Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dems Try to Pre-Empt State of the Union

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:48 PM
Original message
Dems Try to Pre-Empt State of the Union
Source: Associated Press

(01-25) 09:30 PST WASHINGTON, (AP) --

Congressional Democrats, trying to get the jump on President Bush's State of the Union speech, challenged him Friday to renounce the use of waterboarding in interrogations, announce he will close Guantanamo Bay to detainees and outline new policies toward Pakistan and Iran.

Domestically, Democrats said they expect Bush to invest more in the development of renewable energy and to support any compromise Republicans and Democrats strike to renew a law governing the president's secretive surveillance program.

"Our first goal as a country must be to restore that moral authority," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said in prepared remarks to the National Press Club. "It won't happen without the moral leadership of the president of the United States. Perhaps on Monday, President Bush will show that leadership."

In a pair of speeches Friday, Reid played the tough cop in foreign policy while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., spoke of the Iraq war only in closing.

The contrast is emblematic of the trouble Democrats have had since retaking control of Congress a year ago of getting their House and Senate caucuses to speak with one voice on Iraq, and the failure to make good on the promise to force Bush to begin withdrawing troops.



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/01/25/national/w093025S36.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nothing on Dennis' Articles of IMPEACHMENT against Bush**?
Shame on you, SFGate...

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. Please, President Bush?
Pretty please?

Pretty-pretty please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. America needs to deploy renewable energy, not just fund development of renewable energy
It is imperitive that we start replacing fossil fuel generation, NOW, at ANY cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. woooo. strongly worded statements make my little heart flutter!
NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iris5426 Donating Member (697 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Less talk, more doing please. I'm convinced they're useless... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. Peas in a fucking pod. Whatever douchebags n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. They are dreaming if they think this Godless Warmongering Bastard is going to do the right thing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Congress has talked big before
But they always cave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. By enforcing some subpoenas?
No, surely not that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-25-08 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. lololol
Edited on Fri Jan-25-08 06:17 PM by Solly Mack
yeah, that'll restore "moral authority"

lolololol

you want a war criminal president who implemented a torture policy to "renounce" the very torture he brags about even while denying it's happening?

but no one wants to hold him accountable...which actually would go a long way to restoring credibility

so some in congress think that simply renouncing torture will "restore moral authority"?

LMAO

What a pathetic joke

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC