Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spy Satellite Has Lost Power, Could Hit Earth By Late Feb., or March

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:30 PM
Original message
Spy Satellite Has Lost Power, Could Hit Earth By Late Feb., or March
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 03:35 PM by Magic Rat
Source: MSNBC TV

A U.S. Spy Satellite lost power and propulsion and could crash land on Earth within the next month, just reported on MSNBC. No link yet.

Read more: MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, if its lost power and propulsion there's no "could" about its crashing. . .
the only questions are when and where. They should be able to calculate when fairly soon -- seems a simple matter of physics. But unlike Skylab, they won't be able to give it a "boost" to keep it from hitting our hemisphere, so we'll have to wait to see who wins the NSA crap shoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benh57 Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. almost
True, sort of... but that 'when and where' could be thousands, or millions of years away. The moon has no 'power and propulsion', but you don't see it crashing to earth. There is such a thing as a stable orbit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
30. No, spy satellites are kept low
When you're taking pictures of the ground, the lower you are clearer your pictures will be. Most ground observing satellites are in extremely low orbits and experience slight drag from the upper atmosphere. Without computers and propulsion to constantly correct its course, it will come down fairly quickly.

We have satellites in orbit that will stay up there for hundreds of thousands of years unless someone pulls them down, but none of them are spy sats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stewie Donating Member (244 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. I think the "could" refers to when it hits, not if.
They need to get Clint Eastwood and Jim Garner up there after it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's a link to the latest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Could have hazardous materials aboard
Information not being shared by US Gov't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fenriswolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. its a spy satellite
HI NSA :hi: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Most satellites have beryllium on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
50. Is that good for the environment Congress?
What goes up must come down. Do we send garbage people up to space to clean up from your "let no man go where..." blah, blah? We are at war and in huge debt but we must go to Mars, etc. It's a money spending thing for the big Space corporations. It's not about security.

our priorities are all wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. One less spy in the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Out of how many...?
The thought hurts my brain



There are nearly ten thousand man-made objects larger than a softball in Earth orbit. Of these, only seven percent are operational satellites. The remaining ninety-three percent consists of dead satellites, rocket fragments and debris. While these objects are generally very far apart, their presence and great velocity can potentially interfere with space missions and even threaten the lives of astronauts - a tiny speck of paint from a satellite once dug a quarter-inch hole in a space shuttle window. North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) has been tracking these objects since 1961. Today, before every critical launch, analysts perform a collision avoidance test to make sure the mission will not cross paths with any of these objects.
http://www.massivechange.com/2006/07/14/seeing-is-believing-then-what/




U.S. to Expand
Domestic Use
Of Spy Satellites

By ROBERT BLOCK
August 15, 2007

The U.S.'s top intelligence official has greatly expanded the range of federal and local authorities who can get access to information from the nation's vast network of spy satellites in the U.S.

The decision, made three months ago by Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell, places for the first time some of the U.S.'s most powerful intelligence-gathering tools at the disposal of domestic security officials. The move was authorized in a May 25 memo sent to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff asking his department to facilitate access to the spy network on behalf of civilian agencies and law enforcement.

Until now, only a handful of federal civilian agencies, such as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the U.S. Geological Survey, have had access to the most basic spy-satellite imagery, and only for the purpose of scientific and environmental study.

According to officials, one of the department's first objectives will be to use the network to enhance border security, determine how best to secure critical infrastructure and help emergency responders after natural disasters. Sometime next year, officials will examine how the satellites can aid federal and local law-enforcement agencies, covering both criminal and civil law. The department is still working on determining how it will engage law enforcement officials and what kind of support it will give them.

Access to the high-tech surveillance tools would, for the first time, allow Homeland Security and law-enforcement officials to see real-time, high-resolution images and data, which would allow them, for example, to identify smuggler staging areas, a gang safehouse, or possibly even a building being used by would-be terrorists to manufacture chemical weapons.

Overseas -- the traditional realm of spy satellites -- the system was used to monitor tank movements during the Cold War. Today, it's used to monitor suspected terrorist hideouts, smuggling routes for weapons in Iraq, nuclear tests and the movement of nuclear materials, as well as to make detailed maps for U.S. soldiers on the ground in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Plans to provide DHS with significantly expanded access have been on the drawing board for over two years. The idea was first talked about as a possibility by the Central Intelligence Agency after 9/11 as a way to help better secure the country. "It is an idea whose time has arrived," says Charles Allen, the DHS's chief intelligence officer, who will be in charge of the new program. DHS officials say the program has been granted a budget by Congress and has the approval of the relevant committees in both chambers.

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118714764716998275.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. God, we're messy
Is that how to search for sentient life in the universe? Look for the garbage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. Have the Chinese/Russians been engaging in some target practice?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's time for us to have orbiting rovers that can attach themselves to dead satellites and bring
them in safely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
45. What about lame duck presidents?
Got anything for that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #45
61. I know the perfect person it shoud it...but I can't say..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oh, no! Saddam could attack us while we're blind!
With all those WMDs! Which he must have taken with him, which is why we can't find them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. There are more where that one came from
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Oh didn't you hear? huckabee spilled the beans at the debate the other
night. Saddam had all those WMD hidden by the Easter Bunny.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Not the Eids bunny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridablue Donating Member (996 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Do you mean the Easter Bunny has WMD ????
OMG.... Chicken Little where are you. :?????? Save us. Where is John Ashcroft. We need a new color chart for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucognizant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Yes
Pink & Lavender
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
51. Welcome to DU!
Chicken Little was at the presidential podium a few State of the Unions ago, scaring us all with talk of all that VX nerve agent and hundreds of gallons of sarin and evil swarthy men with facial hair! BOO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Schema Thing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. I hate to be such a hypochondriac
but I just know this thing has my name on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. cool
i was just gonna ask what it was named.

dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
40. As soon as I heard this report on the radio...
I had a mental picture of it, or a big piece of it, hitting my house. Something like that falls under the heading "Just my luck".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Appropriate government agencies are monitoring the situation"



:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Do we have
any appropriate government agencies still?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
46. Yeah. That makes me feel better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. Straight out of the Arabian Horse Breeders Association n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
63. Aw, shit.
That means we're truly screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. I ponder, is China playing with their newest toys perhaps? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
7 of 11 Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. or a hacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
i want in Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
18. We could get lucky
The spy sat might land on Bushes crawford ranch while he and chaney are sleeping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridablue Donating Member (996 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. If it reaches Earth does it have immunity from prosecution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. 70% or greater chance it lands in the ocean
and chances are if it hits land, it hits nothing.

if you think you are going to be hit by this, buy a lotto ticket, you have about the same chance of winning that as getting hit by this satellite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RL3AO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. But if it makes it to land some of the data could survive which isn't good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. No, it won't.
Between the 2,000 degree reentry temperatures and the impact, there won't be anything usable left -- not even enough parts to re-engineer it to figure out what it looked like, much less how it worked. Besides which, the spy satellites don't store information, they just pass it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Aww shit!
I just bought a lottery ticket. And with my luck, I'll get nailed by a satellite while I'm on my way to cash it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. haha
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tranche Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Hoping for the Taco Bell target!
Hit the target, free Taco for everyone on earth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. Probably a nuclear powered Satellite
................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. We protested that but they did it anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
32. Oh Crap! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
33.  Um..Mir broke up and no damage was done. A shuttle broke up and no damage was done
Sats decay and burn all the time. There are groups that follow decay forecasts and post the orbital data.
http://satobs.org/decay.html

No big deal.

The questions is: Did something attack this sat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. Ha ha. It will crash, mostly intact, in Russia. They will see this as a stealth
chemical attack, and will react by launching a retaliatory strike against our cheese and french fry factories.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. The only survivors will be a man who drinks sterno, and a crying baby with colic. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paulie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
52. And the one unmarried man.
Maybe the monkey too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
53. Hope that prediction didn't Strain you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. link at BBC ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
41. Did they use Chinese parts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
43. Bring it on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
48. Even our most important projects have parts we didn't manufacture
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 01:25 PM by mac2
We don't know what is safe and what is not. People protested as these companies closed but Congress sat on the asses.

Impeach Bush...and don't vote for the old Empire Builders...or their pretenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
44. I've Been Trying To Figure Out Why This Is Coming Out Now
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 08:24 AM by Demeter
First of all, there is no way it's going to get shot out of the sky, for the same reason Star Wars will not work: it's like expecting to knock a bullet out of the air by shooting another bullet at it. We don't have the technology to do that, and the orbits are so crowded that anything less precise could take out some important and still functional stuff with it.

Second, this is way in the future--and if they are giving other nations a heads up, that should be done through diplomatic channels: "Oh, by the way, there's a minute chance that tons of space junk, including chemical and radioactive debris, will come down upon your heads sometime in the next few months..."

No. It just doesn't make any sense to issue this announcement--unless they want to be the amateur astronomers and geeks to the punch. But why?

And if they know it's in a month, they know where, within less than 1000 miles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
49. It's the old chaos and fear smoke screen
They are trying to get Cheney impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
47. Saddam put them there! Weapons of space destruction!
No, sorry. It was Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-27-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
54. Link? I'd like to know Who's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
56. So when do they send a half dozen geriatric cosmonauts to fix it?
a la:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #56
62. US spy satellites KH-12 are called "IKON", it's the same name as in the movie for the Russian one


Forty years later, IKON, a Russian satellite, is reentering the atmosphere. It contains an outdated system based on a design by Corvin. Oddly enough, Corvin's system, originally designed for Skylab, found its way into a Russian satellite at the height of the Cold War.

http://www.haro-online.com/movies/space_cowboys.html


The KH-12, commonly known as "Advanced Key Hole", also known by the codenames Ikon and Improved Crystal, is a successor to the KH-11 reconnaissance satellite and also used digital imaging. It is believed that the KH-12 improved upon the previous design by including signals intelligence capabilities, sensitivity in broader light spectrums (probably into infrared), and possibly including the ability to view "live" images. Data is transmitted through a relay network of communications satellites.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KH-12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
57. Bets are being places on the GPS coordinates
Apparently there is a nice bet line out of the UK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
58. Here's an image of the craft
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
59. You know, with any luck...
damn, can't finish that sentance, otherwise the FBI would be paying me a visit.

But you get the drift. LOL :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-28-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
60. Wouldn't it simply burn up on re-entry? n/t
Wouldn't it simply burn up on re-entry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #60
64. Not guaranteed (hence the fuss).
From the BBC article:
> ... the satellite weighs about 20,000 pounds (9,000kg)
> and is the size of a small bus.

Maybe it will, maybe it wont ...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
65. The NRO- before they attacked us with their rogue spy satellite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC