Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3 Companies Indicted in Pet Food Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 04:58 PM
Original message
3 Companies Indicted in Pet Food Case
Source: ABC News/AP

Two Chinese businesses and a U.S. company were indicted Wednesday in the tainted pet food incidents that killed dozens of animals last year and raised worries about products made in China.

Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co., Suzhou Textiles, Silk, Light Industrial Products, Arts and Crafts I/E Co., and Las Vegas-based ChemNutra Inc. were charged in two separate but related indictments. The U.S. attorney's office in Kansas City said the tainted food led to the death and serious illness of pets in the U.S. last year.

One of the indictments charges Xuzhou Anying Biologic, located in China's Jiangsu Province, and Suzhou Textiles, in Suzhou, China, with 13 counts of introduction of adulterated food into interstate commerce and 13 counts of introduction of misbranded food into interstate commerce.

ChemNutra and company owners Sally Quing Miller, a Chinese national, and her husband, Stephen S. Miller were charged with 13 counts of introduction of adulterated food into interstate commerce, 13 counts of introduction of misbranded food into interstate commerce and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

The indictments allege that Suzhou Textiles, an export broker, mislabeled 800 metric tons of wheat gluten tainted with the toxic chemical melamine to avoid inspection in China. Xuzhou then did not properly declare the contaminated product it shipped to the U.S. as a material to be used in food, the indictment says.



Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=4251943



About time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Thought It Was More Like Hundreds of Dead Pets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah - ABC's web headline says 4,000+ pets dead
From what I was reading last year I had to believe it numbered in the hundreds or thousands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. one of the vets who posts here was saying at the time that, from what she was seeing and hearing,
vets all around the country were working frantically 24/7-- and the death toll was far higher than the media was reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ultimately, the vet website I was monitoring concluded that
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 06:40 PM by kestrel91316
several thousand pets died, IIRC. I will go back there and check to refresh my memory.

One of the problems was, lots of pets got sick/died and never had tissue testing done so they could be counted among the victims. And case definition has been problematic. We see lots of renal disease in elderly animals anyway......

From the FDA website:
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2008/NEW01792.html

News of this indictment must have hit VIN, lol. I can't get the pet food recall thread to come up - must be JAMMED.

On edit: I found a fairly recent post at VIN that says 347 cases that THEY were tracking met the criteria for the case definition. Mortality 60-70% (cats were higher than dogs). IMHO this is the tip of the iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. I'm still not so sure this isn't what happened to my dog.
They said she had lung cancer, but that didn't seem to be bothering her at all (slight wheezing). She was definitely having some real kidney issues that came up just about a month or so after this food was hitting the market. They couldn't pinpoint what was going on there after tons of testing. They wouldn't even consider the food as a possibility because it was Science Diet dry prescription from the vet mixed with Pedigree and Sci Diet Script wet. The kidney issues greatly diminished when I changed her over to an all natural human-grade diet.

Unfortunately, she died over Thanksgiving of a stroke. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Somewhere in China they're saying...
...damn. They're more concerned about animals which we consume, than they do for human life in another country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. 800 Metric Tons...
yet we're expected to believe that none made it into any human food products?

The current government has zero credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Are you aware of any sudden up-tick in human renal failure cases
where mysterious crystals were found in the kidneys on postmortem?

'Cause I'm not. And I happen to believe that American pathologists would have noticed something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You think every time..
... someone dies of kidney failure, there is a "postmortem".

Yeah, right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. If the death didn't make sense, you bet.
And renal biopsies do happen when somebody gets renal failure unexpectedly. And more importantly, the crystals show up IN THE URINE. Call up your local human hospital lab and see just how many urinalyses they do in a day and get back to me.

Veterinarians aren't stupid. Neither are physicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. My cat Rocky, who is nine years old, is dying right now...
he has been sick for three days and we have to put him to sleep tomorrow because he has kidney failure. I know this is common in older cats BUT, we have to know more about the food supply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The good thing is, reputable pet food manufacturers are now testing
their ingredients for melamine and cyanuric acid (the deadly combo of adulterants).

Sorry about your kitty. Before you put him to sleep, if you want, PM me with his lab numbers (BUN, Creatinine, Phosphorus, Urine Specific Gravity). Some vets don't get aggressive enough with these guys. Some can be turned around and have very good QOL for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. There's a great yahoo group
Feline-CRF-Support

that helped me keep my cat alive for two additional years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Me, too. My Ari lived 2 1/2 years with crf, largely due to info I found there. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. About your sick kitty
I had a cat with kidney failure, and I was able to give him a few more years of quality happy life by administering subcutaneous fluids every couple of days or so. It's easy to do, inexpensive, and I'm glad I did it. Your vet can tell you if it might work for Rocky, and also show you how to do it. (You can even take him in and let them do it if you want to, but it is so easy that you can do it yourself.)

Eventually, my cat did succumb. But until the last couple of days, he was a happy hungry guy whose company I enjoyed then, and I still miss today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. As TheMadMonk stated below:
These chemicals do not have the same toxicity on humans. Cats are at serious risk of renal failure, dogs, less so. However, I would think that anyone with impaired kidney and/or liver function would also be at risk since they would be less able to process and eliminate this chemical and it's byproducts.

However, my point in replying: Where did I say, or even imply, that any people had died, or even been sickened, as a result of food products contaminated with melamine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMadMonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Not wonderful I know, but fortunately the offending chemicals...
...are less toxic to us, IIRC, than to our animal companions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. Link to ChemNutra's CEO Stephen Miller's congressional testimony:
Edited on Wed Feb-06-08 06:57 PM by kestrel91316
http://www.chemnutra.com/Commerce%20Committee%20Submissions.pdf

And link to ChemNutra's website - they don't appear to have anything for their shareholders about the indictments yet - odd, that:
http://www.chemnutra.com/pricipals.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
allisonthegreat Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-06-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That's just the deaths they know about
probably like people's pets just dying and they can't afford vet care, so no autopsy was done. Probably actually a hell of a lot more than 4000+.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC