Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Attorney general: No waterboarding investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BadGimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:25 PM
Original message
Attorney general: No waterboarding investigation
Source: CNN.com

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Attorney General Michael Mukasey told lawmakers Thursday he will not open a criminal investigation into the CIA's acknowledged use of "waterboarding" on terror suspects.


House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers asked Mukasey bluntly whether he was starting a criminal investigation since CIA chief Michael Hayden has confirmed the use of waterboarding.

"No, I am not, for this reason: Whatever was done as part of a CIA program at the time that it was done was the subject of a Department of Justice opinion through the Office of Legal Counsel and was found to be permissible under the law as it existed then," he said.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/07/mukasey.waterboarding/index.html



go fogure...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ursi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. more outrageous crap from the Bush administration and the Congress that approved this AG!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good grief
WTF?
They're good, aren't they?
Just when it gets hot, Gonzo leaves, and the new guy says this.
WTF just WTF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is no law in America if you're rich or powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. The what, and what, and when?????
No, I am not, for this reason: Whatever was done as part of a CIA program at the time that it was done was the subject of a Department of Justice opinion through the Office of Legal Counsel and was found to be permissible under the law as it existed then," he said.

Damn criminals protecting the rest of the criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Opens the door for congressional action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you , Senators Feinstein and Schumer
for being spineless compromisers. Look, Tweedledee and Tweedledum, the mere fact that Bush wants something is good enough reason to be against it! A knee-jerk rejection of all things Bush in the past seven years would have give far better, more honest, fairer, and more Constitutional government than what did actually happen.

Hope you're enjoying your 30 pieces of silver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. They just him voted out of committee
But they weren't the only ones who voted for him in the Senate:

Besides Schumer and Feinstein, Democrats voting to confirm Mukasey were: Sens. Evan Bayh of Indiana, Tom Carper of Delaware, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana and Ben Nelson of Nebraska.

Lieberman's vote isn't much of a surprise:

Of the Senate's two independents, Joe Lieberman of Connecticut voted for confirmation and Bernie Sanders of Vermont voted against.


And these four didn't even show up for the vote:

Not voting were Democratic presidential candidates Joe Biden of Delaware, Hillary Clinton of New York, Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Barack Obama of Illinois. All four had said they opposed Mukasey's nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. Schumer was his main D patron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-08-08 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. They both had a chance to kill it in committee
By saying "He's so bad, he doesn't deserve a full Senate vote".

They didn't. Their excuse was "well, if he's not approved by the Senate, Bush will just recess-appoint some neocon fanatic during the holiday break". But Reid kept the Senate in session during the holiday break enough to prevent this, so their excuse falls very flat.

Quitters never win. And that's what they did, they quit trying to stop Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. Did anyone actually think he would??
We have currently got the most corrupt government I have ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, now THERE'S a revelation.
Didn't we all know Mukasey was going to run interference for this criminal mob?

Mukasey = Bush Family consigliere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. I talked to Conyers, Waxman and Leahy's offices today.
They sounded as pissed as I was. None of that rude brush aside crap I usually get. Leahy's office, at the Judiciary Committee, told me that the DoJ had the case now. I asked when they would pick it up, because I garunteed Mr."waterboarding might not be torture" Mukasy would find nothing.

Theya cted as if they would, when it became clear that the DoJ wouldn't.

Conyers office asked ME if I thought it warrented Impeachment. I said absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fredda Weinberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hearings ... gotta love hearings. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I think Conyers' office had to hire temps to field all the extra phonecalls. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I told them I wasn't going to stop calling until they took action
against the War Crimes. They agreed that War Crimes have been committed and admitted to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. The gravedigger strikes again. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. In other words ...
it's fine to break the law as long as someone advises you that it's perfectly legal to do so ... even if that advice is contrary to existing law. :eyes: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. Since when does a convenient and suspect "interpretation" of a law provide legal cover?
1) We signed the Geneva Convention and various international treaties.
2) Torture is illegal under the Geneva Convention, international law and U.S. law.
3) Waterboarding is universally recognized as a form of torture.

They can't spin their way out of this and, for once, I'm hopeful that Congress isn't going to let them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. If they look, they'll find something
so it's better if they just don't look. See?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
17. why should you and I obey any laws at all then... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. Can we strip Feinstein and Schumer of their super-delegate status? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. I can't get an answer at Schumer's office. I wonder why.
The asshole is probably hiding under his desk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deny and Shred Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. I know two men serving in Iraq, and I hope they're never captured
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. Mukasey is a war criminal for protecting them
and Congress approved Mukasey and they are war criminals all who voted for his approval

but he will be out soon we hope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
24. We can't run around willy nilly prosecuting people for things they did in the past.
Edited on Thu Feb-07-08 05:24 PM by mahatmakanejeeves
We'd never get anywhere if we spent all our time doing that.

Besides, according to the terms of the unitary executive theory, the prezzidunce is the chief legal authority of the land. If it's OK with him, that should be good enuff for anybody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. So ugh, murder statute of limitations that doesn't expire is bullshit to you?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tired Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. As long as we (dems) investigate and prosecute
thats all i care about now. If the Dems drop the ball when its passed, then they are just as guilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReformedChris Donating Member (252 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
27. I hope that HRC or Obama will turn Justice around and expose the Bu$h admin for what it is nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigan-Arizona Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I hope you're right but I'm thinking not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Torn_Scorned_Ignored Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. found to be permissible

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-07-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here's the first draft of a letter to the editor.
Today at a Senate hearing, Attorney General Mukasey said his office will not be investigating the use of water torture on prisoners. He also said that he will not be investigating the illegal wiretapping of innocent American citizens. His justification was "I think what I said was that we could not investigate or prosecute somebody for acting in reliance on a Justice Department opinion." This sounds very much like the Nuremberg defense of “I was just following orders.”

When I was in the Military I knew I could refuse an illegal order. If I was ordered to torture a prisoner, I could legally refuse because I was bound by the 1948 Geneva Convention against torture and UCMJ Article 93. I knew I wouldn’t have a legal leg to stand on if I was hauled before a war crimes tribunal. I couldn’t justify torture by saying I was only forwarding orders.

Bush wants the Telecoms to be granted immunity from the law because they went along with his illegal wiretapping. They may have had doubts about the legality of his program, but when they saw what happened to one Telecom company that refused, they buckled under. Cowardice is no defense. Just because Alberto Gonzales, George Bush, or Mukasey say it is legal, doesn’t make it legal, and just following orders, even under duress, doesn’t make you immune from the laws of the land.





------

If you like where I am going with this, feel free to borrow. If you think I am full of shit, let me know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC