Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maine caucus shatters turnout record

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:24 AM
Original message
Maine caucus shatters turnout record
Source: The Hill

Despite snowfall, Democrats in Maine more than doubled the state’s previous turnout record for presidential caucuses Sunday as Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) defeated Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) for the majority of the state’s delegates.

With 97 percent of caucus precincts reporting, 46,000 Maine Democrats had participated in the nominating contest compared with 17,000 in 2004, the state’s previous record, according to the Maine Democratic Party.

The high turnout in Maine follows a record-breaking turnout for Democrats in the Washington caucus Saturday, and Nebraska caucuses that saw participants overflowing election sites and caucusing outside.

Arden Manning, executive director of the Maine Democratic Party, said turnout was exceptionally high across the state.

“We did have high turnout in populated areas,” Manning told The Hill. “But rural areas had some of the highest turnout we’ve ever seen.”

Read more: http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/maine-caucus-shatters-turnout-record-2008-02-11.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. where's joshcryer? he'll have a stroke.....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. If I Were Among the Powers That Be in the Democratic Party
I would be scanning the horizon for pitchforks and torches. There's change coming, and that's NOT what the DLC had in mind....Expect a wave of retirements in the Democratic Party in the coming years, as political hacks and wholly owned corporate subsidiaries decide to retire while the getting is good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. self delete
Edited on Mon Feb-11-08 11:17 AM by formercia
dupe. slow server.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm warming my pot of tar as we speak.
I'm glad I saved those old musty pillows full of chicken feathers.

All assholes are fair game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. that's funny; if u cant laf @ that u cant laf @nuttin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacjr Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. and there are over 1 million eligible voters in maine.
What a shell game. A doubling of a turnout from 2 % to 4% means nothing to me. I wish those who praise caucus victories would gain a sense of prospective of what the results mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Remember That Behind Every Activist Are 10 Fellow Travelers
and the momentum is for change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. The term Fellow Travelers
Has a negative connotation where I came from. It referred to members of the Communist party and Soviet agents.

Fellow Travelers should look elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. bitter much?
and I wish who use words they're not sure of would consult a dictionary before posting. Check out the meaning of the word "prospective" as opposed to "perspective".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacjr Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thanks for correcting my grammer.
Your kind advice is greatly appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. He corrected your spelling, not your "grammar" (not "grammer").
Edited on Wed Feb-13-08 10:03 AM by Divernan
grammar n. The study of how words and their component parts combine to form sentences. The study of structural relationships in language or in a.
www.answers.com/topic/grammar - 102k - Cached - Similar pages

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. But of those, 300,000 or so are Democrats
Only Democrats take part in the party caucus.

So it's a bit more than 2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-13-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Spell check here: That's "perspective", not "prospective"
Don't get mad; get a dictionary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Interesting comment on my blog in this connection
It's from someone in Maine, describing the scene and the determination of the voters.

The original post is here: http://eyeblister.blogspot.com/2008/02/bush-deserves-prison-in-this-life-and.html The relevant comment is the second one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. Must be just terrifying for *ss to see this sleeping giant awaken all
over the US. We still believe in Democracy even if our present leaders do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Finally...
There's still much work to be done but it's a promising start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes. I think that it will continue enough to get us elected in 08 but
then most will probably go back to sleep as it is too hard to keep informed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. If only interest could be maintained at the local level --
representatives, senators, state senators, governors, etc. That's where the real revolution begins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-11-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. The forces of darkness are working on ways to put the giant back to sleep
I don't know what their plans are, but I'm sure they have them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freethought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. I was at one of them!
I was at the Democratic Party caucus in Falmouth, ME. Held as the high school, it was!!!
Place was packed! There were 668 votes cast for delegates. I guess this shattered a long standing record. I can remember the exact numbers but it was 400 and change for Obama and 100 and change for Clinton. Needless to say, the favor was leaning toward Obama by a ratio of about 4 to 1.
There were a few votes for Kucinich and Edwards. Needless to say Obama took Maine. In Portland, people were standing outside in snow squalls to cast their vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
18. I have been impressed by the Dem turnout across the country, and
I do see that as a very positive sign for the Dems, BUT have you heard the actual % of voters who actually voted in the primary's so far? It's still absymally low. Just in the last few days I've heard numbers like 2% or 4% of the eligible voters! THAT'S AWFUL! When I heard some of those reports yesterday, all I could think was "Damn if we're getting rocord turnout now and it's only 2%, it muct have been HORRIBLE in the past!"

I HOPE the Dem enthusiasm continues into the fall, and turnout in Nov. really IS a record! A BIG Record, like 70%+.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC