Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

3 U.S. Soldiers, 2 Iraqis Killed in Bomb Attack War Death Toll Reaches 500

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 07:54 AM
Original message
3 U.S. Soldiers, 2 Iraqis Killed in Bomb Attack War Death Toll Reaches 500
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20040117041909990005

TIKRIT, Iraq (Jan. 17) - A roadside bomb detonated north of Baghdad on Saturday, killing three U.S. soldiers and two Iraqi civil defense troopers, a U.S. military spokesman said. The deaths bring to 500 the number of American service members who have died since the Iraq war began.

Two Americans also were wounded in the attack, which occurred when a
Bradley Fighting Vehicle struck an explosive device on a road near Taji, about 20 miles north of Baghdad, said Lt. Col. Bill McDonald, a spokesman for the 4th Infantry Division.

The vehicle caught fire (made of aluminum) , killing the three Americans and two Iraqis who were on joint U.S.-Iraqi patrol, McDonald said.

CNN reported that the Bradley flipped over and caught fire.

Also Saturday, the military said a U.S. soldier died from a non-hostile gunshot wound south of Baghdad. The incident occurred Friday evening near Diwaniyah south of Baghdad, the command said in a statement. No further details were released.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush bats 500!
Keep it up, Slugger!

No to mention his record of 10,000 wounded and hideously crippled. He's my hero! Bring 'em on! He's no sissy Democrat, latte-drinkin' liberal loser!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Stop the sarcasm..
at least one could imagine having a drink with bush opposed to Gore who was so stiff...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yea, but Bush is a drunk n/t
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 08:37 AM by NNN0LHI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. oh what a lovely comparison....
Hmmm, which would I choose. A drink with a drunken, moronic loser who can't string a sentence together when he is sober. Or a coffee with one of the most intelligent, thoughtful, engaging Democratic leaders of our time. Guess.... :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
are_we_united_yet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. Oooooh good one!
Clever

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
47. Now you are the one being sarcastic, right?
Must be. It doesn't make sense the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #47
50. .
Damn,it surely embarrasses me when my poor attempts at sarcasm/humour don't work.
I blame it on the reasoning of certain repubs that some people consider the possibility that it wasn't a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
53. Never mind eom
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 02:09 PM by wryter2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pax Argent Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. I used to think that
Until I saw him on Saturday Night Live. The man is quick and funny and I feel that it is a damn shame that the supreme court cheated him and us as a nation.

Its sad that class and comportment can be misconstrued as being "stiff", but at least there are no pictures of Gore on record with his finger up his nose!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pax Argent Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #55
64. On second thought
maybe I would have a beer with bush, but I wouldn't share a plate of nachos with him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bfusco Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
22. I think Bush's average is much higher
Is 10,000 the actual number or is that just where they stopped counting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Specs on a Bradley-25 TON vehicle NBC says the turret split open
I was a gunner on one of these during my time in the Cav ('90-93). This is really scary.



http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/books/www/256.htm

CHARACTERISTICS
Length: 20.5 feet
Width: 10.5 feet
Height: 9.7 feet
Weight: 24.8 tons (M2) 24.7 tons (M3)
Speed: 41 miles per hour
Range: 300 miles
Crew: 3
Passengers: 6 (M2) 2 (M3)
ARMAMENT
Primary: 25-mm. cannon
Secondary: 7.62-mm. machine gun
TOW missiles (two launch tubes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. CNN reported that the blast blew the turret completely off
One hell of a blast.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. Yikes
They had to pull the turret out of my Brad (it leaned to the left and no one could figure out why) and I can tell you that was no easy task.

That must have been a huge explosion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zech Marquis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
44. my god!!!
to blow the turret off one of these things--that was one hell of a blast :( and a bunch of new US troops are on their way in...:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arpeggia Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Still a far cry from the the 3000 lost in the WTC attack
And if this prevents another 9-11, then so be it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hav Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. yeah
Saddam won't attack the WTC again.That'll teach him.

By the way,your "far cry from the 3000" doesn't include the people of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Welcome to DU
:hi: if'n I haven't before

That was a great response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arpeggia Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yeah, it' sad that the Iraqis who chose to support
the effort against our boys had to die. I agree. Let's hope thugs will think twice before harboring terrorists again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
38. No, I think it's more like
'it's sad they had to defend the effort our boys had against Iraq...'

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
60. Yeah, thats why we're killing women and children
I'm sure the 20,000 innocent civilians we killed were all supporting terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Oh a 9/11 reference
buying that one huh?

Preventing 9/11 would have been a good start but alas counter terrorism measures that were in place and strident warnings that Sandy Berger issued personally to Condi Rice were under applied and the warnings unheeded. Operation Ignore was is full effect.

Please to bring the Sudan story up either, that is a right wing talk radio and FOX propelled distortion (there's a surprise).

As we do with everyone here Welcome to DU :hi:

good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Pray tell, how does invading Iraq prevent another 9-11?
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 08:54 AM by gristy
I know, let's invade France and prevent another 9-11!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arpeggia Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. Simple. Iraq harbored terrorists.
That's been proven. Other countries will think twice about harboring terrorists and WMD now. Witness Libya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. So does France!
That's been proven. I look forward to you leading the charge into Paris!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Were there any terrorists in the US prior to and on 9/11?
If the answer is yes then the all knowing leader of that country could be said to have "harbored terrorists".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #17
57. Just found some in Texas, underpants
Two old white supremacists with a chemical bomb.

Bomb Texas! </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arpeggia Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. Nobody ever said France was in our good graces
A lot of people are growing to despise France and rightfully so
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. are you ready for the draft?
to fight in the neocon vision of endless war? It is coming if junior is reselected....be prepared!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #21
61. I told my daughter to put out the word
in 2000 a vote for Bush was a vote for war, in 2004 a vote for Bush is a vote for the Draft. I tell every young person I talk to. These people have to get out and vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. France, the new boogeyman
When you run out of bad guys you turn on your allies.

Cold War-Soviets were easy guys to put the black hats on

Sprinkle in a WAR on Drugs to create bad guys here

Ooops cold war is over.....we need a bad guy to avert attention to domestic issues

Noreiga! but wait he was OUR S.O.B. no matter attack

Done

Uh uh Saddam! Okay that one was right because there was a cause for that war (regardless of the FACT that he too had been OUR S.O.B.)

Done


Uh uh Clinton! Let's spend $80 million and keep that in the headlines.

uh uh don't want to mention that bastard we can't find..........Saddam!!

uh uh FRANCE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flagg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #18
29. we're so scaaaaaaaaaaaaared LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #18
36. Arpeggia, welcome to DU
but you gonna have your hands full...

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. What terrorists? Ansar al-Islam?
In the North of Iraq where Saddam had no control?

The alQaeda related group that was alQaeda foothold in Iraq to overthrow Saddam?

Where is Salmon Pak? Have they ever given it's actual location? NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
58. Don't forget Saudi Arabia
Just found some Al Qaeda camps there.

Invade Saudi Arabia </sarcasm>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. didn't we have terrists in upstate NY???
Guess we better start bombing the states cuz that's how you show them, right. I believe Saudi Arabia harbors terrists too, but we can't bomb the Bush Crime Buddys now can we? Your logic is flawed to say the least....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. harboring terrorists in US
Just off the top of my head:

Florida, New Jersey, Alabama, Calfornia, New York, Nevada, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma ...

DAMN .... we got a LOT of states to bomb!!! Let's get crackin' Mr. With Us Or Against Us.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Al Qaeda attacked the US, not Saddam or any of his pet groups...
If you believe Libya was frightened into giving up on its WMD programs (programs being the operative word here), then I pray you never find a future position in government, because:

A) You're naive
B) Every country has WMD programs (for self-defense purposes), but may or may not have the ability to produce them. Iraq most certainly fell into this category.

Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11. Bush, Powell, Rice and Wolfwitz ALL admit that.

You should try stepping away from that ClearChannel station and read a bit more, because you are most uninformed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
25. Give me one example of an Iraqi committing a terrorist attack...
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 09:13 AM by NNN0LHI
...against the US. Bet you can't. I can give you an example of a Republican committing an act of terror against the US though. Timothy McVeigh.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bfusco Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #12
32. What are you talking about?
Iraq's regime was secular and worked to suppress Islamic fundamentalism. Not one terrorist attack against the United States originated in Iraq. Iraq is probably the only region of the Middle East where a tight lid was kept on Islamic fundamentalism (with the exception of the regions that Hussein had no control over. Bin Laden is thrilled the US has done one of the their chief aims in removing Hussein and now providing a vast frontier to wage war against the United States, incite anti-American/Western sentiment in the region and hopefully further destabilize the region. If you want to see the real scourge of Al Qaeda look no further then Saudi Arabia; from indoctrination of hatred, funding, recruitment and execution of attacks but of course Bush and Co's is completely in bed with the Saudi Royal family all for the sake of oil. Hussein was the easiest and most convenient scapegoat to launch this neo-con snow job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
46. Witness Libya
Oh My My.....Libya is about Oil. No more No less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestTransplant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
51. Yeah sure, Libya
I am sure he was real scared. Next stop was surely N. Africa. Did you ever think that he was concerned about an fundamentalist insurgency in his country and that's why he came crying to the West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
56. Which ones?
Ansar al Islam, maybe? The group that used to be beyond Saddam's control and is now free to roam Iraq killing our troops?

You need a geography lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #12
59. Proven eh?
Lets see, did you not see Bush and Powell admit on TV that they have no evidence Saddam was working with Bin Laden or had any connection with Al Queda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
28. Excuse me but Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11!!
For christs sake this fraud of a war will CAUSE MORE TERRORISM not end it! we attacked a country that HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH 9/11
and our kids are dying for NOTHING.
Jesus Christ wake up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
33. Why do you hate American soldiers?
Talking about their deaths with such glee is unamerican. You should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishguy Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
35. What is this statement all about?! Iraq and 9/11-No connection
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
41. bushinc attacked the WTC
that's the good news (ie: there aint any danger from islamic terrorism, not beyond ordinary criminal extremeism (see 1972, '73, '74, '75 etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
49. Hey, if another 9-11 is needed you can bet George will see to it
that he lets it happen again. Killing thousands of innocent people who had nothing to do with 9-11, is no security at all against another terrorist attack on US soil In fact, for those who are a little slow on the uptake, I will advise that it almost ensures that another attack is inevitable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
54. Well, then
How many American kids is Bush allowed to kill in your book, then? 2,999? 3,001?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meti57b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
26. Getting saddam was not worth the life of even one of our brave military ..
and now we have lost 500 of them. Of course, this wasn't really about saddam, ..it was about oil and US control of the middle east.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
31. RWer disappears
how typical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamblingRose Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
30. Terrorists in the U.S.? Don't forget the cases of anthrax that the media
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 09:26 AM by RamblingRose
& repugs seems to have forgotten about! I guess that was Saddam too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. He forgot about Reagan and Bush 1 supporting Osama bin Laden...
...for over a decade too. Osama was known as a freedom fighter back then. The US must have trained and supplied him very well.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. Reagan Bush supporting Sadam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pippin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
39. Guess we've forgotten Oklahoma,
and the una-bomber. Don't forget who "made" Sadam. He was "our man in Iraq" and the US most certainly helped him and ther Baathists come into power. As far as Bush and his cabal are concerned, right now, the world regards them as terrorists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. April 19, 1995
Sad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bob3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
37. Damn * and all his butchers
And a special place in hell for the people who decided that aluminum armor was a good idea for a APC you can bet they weren't going to be riding in a Bradley.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
43. Very Sad
I was just hoping this morning that there would be no stories this weekend about deaths - as wrong as Bush was/is-- I don't want to see deaths to keep proving how wrong he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
45. A Damn Shame:
Edited on Sat Jan-17-04 11:55 AM by BenDavid
So now we have the Daytona 500 and the Indy 500 etc etc and all bring happiness to those that enjoy that sport, but with the Bush 500 there are no trophies given. No big pay check. No points given. There is no winner, but these brave soldiers that took their orders and did their jobs and served our country proud are not losers and did not die in vain either. We as a country are the losers by having lost these brave soldiers and just where is the damn outrage. Oh there is plenty in DU but damn, the Democrats in Congress are not outraged. There has to come a time when you just have to say, enough is enough. As long as bush can get away with "Fear" in 04 and those elected to speak for us puts their voices on mute, then we will have more of this. Remember in thought or prayer those that made the ultimate sacrifice.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcuno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
48. May they all find peace with God.
So sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
52. More bad news from Iraq
From the NY Times article on the Bradley attack:

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/18/international/middleeast/18IRAQ.html

On Friday morning, insurgents attacked the south-central headquarters of the American-led Coalition Provisional Authority in Hilla, about 60 miles southwest of Baghdad, killing one Iraqi and wounding several others, American authorities said in a statement. The Americans gave no other details of the attack.

Also on Friday, saboteurs blew up a pylon supporting a high-voltage line leading from the north-central town of Beiji to Kirkuk, plunging Kirkuk into darkness. Since the summer, insurgents have been particularly active around Beiji, focusing their efforts on destroying oil pipelines from the oil-rich region around Kirkuk. As a result, Iraq has so far been unable to export oil from the area through a pipeline to Turkey.

The road where the Taji attack took place is one that locals, rather than the military, use often, Major Aberle said. But American soldiers and Iraqi Civil Defense Corps members at a base on the edge of Taji described the area where the attack occurred as hostile. By 2 p.m., the highway from Taji to Baghdad was closed because of another bomb on the road, which American ordnance experts detonated.

Mr. Khalaf said Americans regularly patrol the road, which is near a fuel depot, although they travel at varying times, and that other attacks had occurred along it. American soldiers near the scene of the attack were clearly jumpy. A tank crewman from the Fourth Infantry Division tried to grab a camera from a photographer with The New York Times who was walking near Mr. Khalaf's farmhouse, and dragged her toward his tank until her use of English convinced him she was not a local resident.

----snip----

Yikes. Getting better and better. "Plunged Kirkuk into darkness"???? Jeeeesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
62. Bush finally beats Poppy at something.
His gulf war kills more Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
63. U.S. death toll reaches 500 - Canadian article
U.S. death toll reaches 500 as 3 soldiers killed in bombing north of Baghdad

http://www.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2004/01/17/316358-ap.html

This benchmark - this appalling benchmark - is not being lost on the rest of the world. Will it be here?

<snip>

The deaths raised to 500 the number of U.S. service members who have died since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq started March 20. Of those, 346 died as a result of hostile action and 154 of non-hostile causes, according to Defence Department figures.

Most of the deaths have occurred since Bush declared an end to major fighting on May 1. The death toll from the Persian Gulf War, when a U.S.-led coalition drove then-Iraqi president Saddam Hussein's invaders from Kuwait in 1991, was 315.

In Afghanistan, 100 Americans have been killed, less than a third of them from hostile fire.

A military spokesman in Baghdad, Brig.-Gen. Mark Kimmitt, said troop morale remained high despite the rising death toll.

</snip>

Right, Kimmitt. Morale "remains high."

Gimme a break. Ask the soldiers. Ask the relatives of the soldiers.

s_m


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-17-04 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
65. Message from the Moderator - LBN Thread Consolidation
Let's keep our discussion about the January 17th Tikrit incident consolidated into this thread, which contains a more updated version, and accurate headline, than the original thread.

To read more about this story as it developed, please see the original LBN thread on this topic:

CNN Breaking: 5 servicemembers killed in Iraq

Thanks!

DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC