Source:
AP<snip>
"There was an extraordinary degree of aggressiveness by EPA in pressing states to abandon a more protective mercury program. EPA devoted enormous effort to preventing states from doing more," said Vickie Patton, a lawyer for Environmental Defense. The group obtained the documents through a Freedom of Information Act filing.
The push to rein in uncooperative states continued until the eve of the Feb. 8 appeals court decision that struck down the EPA's program. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said the agency did not adequately address the health impact of its plan.
The administration was poised to take even tougher measures against maverick states. A day before the ruling, the White House Office of Management and Budget approved a draft regulation to impose a "federal implementation plan" for mercury reduction in states whose mercury control measures did not meet EPA approval.
It would have required power plants to comply with the national cap-and-trade provisions, even it that meant ignoring state restrictions.
Both the emissions trading approach and any further requirement on states have been put on hold after the court ruling, EPA spokesman Jonathan Shradar. He denied that the agency was pressuring states.
Read more:
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jkKOQ_A1yR4HewQNx_7OJVd9oAnQD8URICDG0
This is a fairly long article. Very much worth a read for those interested in the battles most of the states are fighting with the EPA on mercury. States are fully aware the Fed plan leaves most manufacturing plants unregulated in their emissions. The pressure on States coming out of the WH was immense.