Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US may shoot down satellite Wednesday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:53 PM
Original message
US may shoot down satellite Wednesday
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON - An attempt to blast a crippled U.S. spy satellite out of the sky using a Navy heat-seeking missile — possibly on Wednesday night — would be the first real-world use of this piece of the Pentagon's missile defense network. But that is not the mission for which it was intended.

The attempted shootdown, already approved by President Bush, is seen by some as blurring the lines between defending against a weapon like a long-range missile and targeting satellites in orbit.

The three-stage Navy missile, designated the SM-3, has chalked up a high rate of success in a series of tests since 2002 — in each case targeting a short- or medium-range ballistic missile, never a satellite. A hurry-up program to adapt the missile for this anti-satellite mission was completed in a matter of weeks; Navy officials say the changes will be reversed once this satellite is down.

The government issued notices to aviators and mariners to remain clear of a section of the Pacific beginning at 10:30 p.m. EST Wednesday, indicating the first window of opportunity to launch an SM-3 missile from a Navy cruiser, the USS Lake Erie, in an effort to hit the wayward satellite.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080219/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/dead_satellite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Duck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nycmuse Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. And Cover n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are either very confident that their crappy star wars technology
can do this.

OR

the freaking satellite is gonna fall in a way that no one will be able to tell that it didn't.

Personnaly I'm leaning toward the later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I had the same thought
I read this and immediately thought it must be about to fall of it's own accord and they plan on using it to their advantage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. The Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System has 8 hits out of 10 attempts
while I don't know how it will work against a real ballistic missile attack, this satellite is a much easier target due to it's predicable orbit.

Here is a description of the system and the tests they have run:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aegis_Ballistic_Missile_Defense_System
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Er. Let me get this straight.
They made changes to the SM-3 missile to enable it to shoot down the satellite. OK, I follow that. Then, after it shoots down the satellite, they're going to change the missile back? Sorry, what? Won't the missile be destroyed? Or are they so pessimistic about the chances of success, they figure they'll just retrieve the missile from whatever back yard it landed in, dust it off, and reconfigure it for ABM defense?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pimpbot Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I believe they meant reconfigure the program
The missile itself is a goner once its up there. I am assuming they meant they will reconfigure the missle programming on that ship to do defense once again. Although now that they have the satellite blow up program done, I dont see why they wouldnt leave a copy of it there, you know, just in case :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That would make sense.
And, as you say, I'm sure they'll probably keep a copy of the program on a floppy somewhere. You know, just for nostalgia's sake. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ORDagnabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. hearing there might be plutonium on board. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why, god help me, why do I have this image of this satellite hitting something
like Rushmore or the capital or something like that

This,sadly, could provide us with the visual end of the Bush administration and the conservative movement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Also total eclipse of the moon Weds - everyone will be watching the night sky
so this is like what?...a superbowl commercial for 'star wars'?...
We'll all get to see our hard earned dollars being shot into space - yippee :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. And in what areas can that be seen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. The Eclipse? Everywhere in the US apparently. The warhead? ..
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 09:49 PM by jannyk
I have no idea, but I'm sure it'll be pretty.
Link to Lunar Eclipse info:

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jyjLAQ7vDuGT2-CSFBsAVPCYEXpAD8UTHS9O0

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Thanks for the link! We're outta luck...
socked in by fog. We had beautiful clear skies for DAYS... PSHAW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Just a lunar eclipse, not a solar one. But full---that's pretty cool anyway. And slow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deny and Shred Donating Member (453 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. If this missile misses, wouldn't that embolden others with rockets
since our missle shield will have been exposed for the Defense-Contract-Pork
farce it is.
Make no mistake, this is the Neocons trying to show off their new toy "in action, on the battlefield" as it were.

http://www.ciponline.org/dfd/shield.htm

http://www.cdi.org/program/document.cfm?DocumentID=3940&StartRow=1&ListRows=10&appendURL=&Orderby=D.DateLastUpdated&ProgramID=6&from_page=index.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. OK - someone educate me, the SM-3 is a HEAT-SEEKING missile,
.
.
.

And the purported reason for the failure is that the satellite can't power up to use the fuel on board,

And so it is still full of fuel.

So it ain't making no heat -

Right?

And if another satellite with a source of heat is nearby,

wouldn't that missile just decide to go for the "heat"?

I dunno,

just askin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Do not believe that the SM3 is a heat seeking missile
The SM series of missiles home on reflected radar energy. Either from a ship board illuminator, or from a terminal guidance radar in the missile nose cone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well, that's what it says in the first sentence of the OP
.
.
.

"An attempt to blast a crippled U.S. spy satellite out of the sky using a Navy heat-seeking missile . . . "

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Against the temperature of outer space
there will be sufficient thermal difference for the kill vehicle to home in on.

Space is huge - satellites are not that close together that it will be an issue. The kill vehicle has a very small search area - much of the difficulty in shooting down ballistic missiles is determining their trajectory accurately enough to get the kill vehicle in the right place at the right time so it will be able to see the target. With a satellite on a predicable orbit that part is relatively easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Been Fishing Donating Member (161 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. It is possible
Just read "infra-red" instead of "heat". The target does not need to be firing a
rocket engine for the SM-3 warhead to detect it. Even satellites will have a
infra-red signature against a space background. Stars, planets, moons, and other
space objects can be ignored.

Many simulations were probably run to come up with an 80% estimate of success.

The SM-3 warhead is kinetic. It carries no explosives. It is the high speed
impact of the warhead hitting the target that will destroy it.

Look at the Missile Defense Agency website:
http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/video.html#seavid.ANC

From the pull-down movie menu, select the FTM-11, 26APR2007 (7.8MB)and click play.
It shows the SM-3 and target launches. There is also sensor tracking of the
impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. It's totally going to target the space shuttle instead. just watch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. The space shuttle will have already landed by that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Uhh, the shuttle will have landed
A gentle suggestion...read up on what your posting about before posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. "Ahh, BushCo using the occult energy of the Eclipse." - Ronald Reagan's Dead Astrology
Edited on Tue Feb-19-08 07:57 PM by SpiralHawk
"Ya gotta hand it to us republicons, we take advantage of every, smirk, opportunity to use the occult. Full Moon eclipse on Wednesday. Smirk. No one will ever figure out what the occultist republicons are really, smirk, up to."

- Ronald Reagan's Dead Republicon Astrologer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Looks like they are gonna try it West of Hawaii - no one will see what happens
.
.
.

will they? way out in the middle of the Pacific?

From another article:

U.S. could shoot down satellite overnight Wednesday

Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:43pm GMT

The U.S. Navy may make its first attempt to shoot down an errant spy satellite loaded with toxic fuel overnight on Wednesday in an area of the Pacific Ocean west of Hawaii, according to U.S. officials and government documents.

A notice to mariners broadcast by the National Geospatial Intelligence Agency warned of "hazardous operations" in the area between 2:30 a.m. and 5 a.m. British time on Thursday.

The Federal Aviation Administration issued a similar notice to airmen.

Officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the notices were intended to clear the area of shipping and air traffic during what could be an initial attempt to down the bus-sized satellite from a U.S. Navy ship in the Pacific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YDogg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. My guess is that either the missile or the satellite will land in Polk County, Florida.
Or bumfuck, Texas, wherever bush is from. Yeah, crawford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-19-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. This is why all satellites should have concealed carry.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
28. Weather May Delay Satellite Shot
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080220/D8UU4DOO2.html
WASHINGTON (AP) - High seas in the north Pacific may force the Navy to wait another day before launching a heat-seeking missile on a mission to shoot down a wayward U.S. spy satellite, the Pentagon said Wednesday.

That sure makes me feel confident about our ability to shoot down incoming missiles. I'm pretty sure that North Korean missiles aren't designed to get wet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. If the weather is nice!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. they already hit it with a missile but. they don't know yet whether it hit the fuel tank.
That was an hour ago and I haven't watched the news since. I'm sure there must be some more up to date news. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC