Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush: No Compromise On Phone Immunity In Spy Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:21 PM
Original message
Bush: No Compromise On Phone Immunity In Spy Bill
Source: Reuters

ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush said on Thursday he would not compromise with the Democratic-led Congress on his demand that phone companies that took part in his warrantless domestic spying program be shielded from lawsuits.

Bush has demanded Congress protect companies like AT&T Inc and Verizon Communications from civil lawsuits that accuse them of violating Americans' privacy rights in the administration's anti-terrorism program.

The Senate approved a measure that would grant the companies retroactive immunity but the House of Representatives has opposed it. The surveillance program began in 2001 after the September 11 attacks and some 40 lawsuits are pending.

House and Senate Democrats said they would try to find a compromise even as they said their Republican counterparts refused to permit staff to meet with them on Thursday.

"I would just tell you there's no compromise on whether these phone companies get liability protection," Bush told reporters as he traveled back from a trip to Africa.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN2150511720080221
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck you, George.
Our representives had better not compromise either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. My sentiments exactly.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Mine too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tahoelewis Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Phone company immunity
Oh course the Democrats will cave. Pelosi has neither balls nor a spine. (Pelosi should be off the table, not Bush's impeachment.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did he have sex with a lobbyist too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
27. Depends on your definition of "did"...
...but * has enjoyed intimacies with the corporations the like of which he's never had with Laura.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Oh isn't that the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. There isn't a phone that justifyably needs to be tapped that can't be tapped under the current FISA
pissypants just feels its beneath him to have to submit to a judge and justify a warrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. who cares what a fascist war criminal thinks? He is the worst president in US history
why do the print this as though he still has ANY credibility? :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Like a bank robber trying to get immunity for the teller who helped him with the inside job
The Bushies and by extension the entire Republic Party is a criminal organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. See, Dems? This is what you get when you to to make nice and let criminals walk.
Fucking TOLD YOU SO, you complicit cowards.

When will you ever learn? How many have to be violated and die before you wake up and do your job to STOP THESE GANGSTERS?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. "You are either with the Evil Ones, or you are against us." - Commander AWOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good, let the shit bag sulk!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanstaafl Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. With a 19% approval rating ...
With a 19% approval rating who gives a sh!t what you think!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreepFryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. And who exactly is surprised by this? Wouldn't a Bush offer of compromise surprise us more? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtanarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. I Agree!
We should not compromise. At all. Let the damn thing rot on the vine now that the sunset provision has passed.

It's beyond me why the leadership gave it any floor time to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. He's soiling himself over this
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 09:38 PM by Canuckistanian
Which means it's his greatest weakness.

"Telecom immunity" is his kryptonite.

Attack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. You can read him like a book.
He did the same thing over Mukasey, we all know how that worked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. No kidding
He'll expect the same results, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. If the civil lawsuits go forward...
those pesky facts will start popping up, like the fact that it started right after shithead took office. And the possibility that he's been spying on government officials for blackmail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. '...after the September 11 attacks...'?
I thought it started right after he took office(sorry day that was).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgervan Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
20. What a Dick
... just an observation. How many days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmbo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Duh? Of course... Because Telecom immunity = Bush/Rove Immunity
Don't mistake Bush's tantrum as a principled stand.

He knows that if he bullies the Congress into immunizing the Telecoms, he --and Rove and Gonzalez-- will also dodge the bullet on the 42 USC Section 1983 actions which are being prepared against them for violation of our constitutional rights under color of law.

He's desperately trying to save his own neck and passing it off to a gullible media as a patriotic gesture.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
habitual Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. i absolutely agree with you
although i'd add that the telecoms in question have prolly also added pressure on him saying if they didn't get immunity, they'd spill all the beans on him.

he's so screwed if the telecoms don't get immunity, that's why he will NEVER allow while he is in office, guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
23. Well if Dems have a SPINE there will be NO compromise from them either...
..meaning NO immunity, retroactive or otherwise, for the telcoms.

Let bu$hit sulk and toss a hissy-fit and let him piss and moan.

SEND HIM BACK the same plan over and over - the one that includes NO IMMUNITY for the bastards - and if bu$h won't pass it - FINE!

Then it's HIS fault nothing got done. Because HE isn't cooperating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Dem "leadership" with a spine?
:rofl:

They're just biding their time before rolling over again. Harry & the DINO's went first- now it's Pelosi & the Congress' turn.

In an election year- to Mr. 19% no less!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
24. it is not the phone companies' liability he is worried about of course
but his OWN and that of his evil minions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
25. Why don't you veto the entire bill, Mr. 19%? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
26. "began in 2001 after the September 11 attacks" - DAMN - they were prescient!
Hooking up the machinery 6 months before something nobody could have anticipated happened.

Get it right, Reuters!

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
29. Well for once he's right.
No compromise! Fuck Him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q3JR4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
31. Then the Dem congresspeople shouldn't
give him any legislation at all. Pass the bill once and if he vetoes it, then let the whole thing die. See how he likes that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC