Source:
Chicago TribuneWASHINGTON - A decision expected Friday on federal approval for Genentech's Avastin cancer drug could have ramifications for all companies developing cancer medicines.
Genentech made its case for Food and Drug Administration approval of Avastin using a widely debated measure of drug effectiveness that focuses on tumor growth, not patient survival.
...
In December, a panel of outside FDA advisers voted 5 to 4 against Genentech's application, arguing the drug's benefits did not outweigh dangerous and toxic side effects]. FDA is not required to follow the panel's advice, although it often does.
At issue is how the agency judges the effectiveness of cancer treatments. Traditionally, FDA only approved cancer drugs that extended the lifespan of patients. However, in recent years companies have studied alternate measures of a drug's effectiveness. One of the most controversial measures is so-called progression-free survival, or how long the drug halts the spread of cancer.
Read more:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/features/lifestyle/health/sns-ap-cancer-treatment-fda,1,2444778.story
OK, fellow sacks of water (Trekkies knows what this means). Genentech is saying to me, the cure is worse than the disease, but that's OK.