Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Trout bearing chemicals are even in our national parks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 06:07 PM
Original message
Trout bearing chemicals are even in our national parks
Source: Seattle Post-Intelligencer

You may turn up your nose at farmed Atlantic salmon or shrimp raised in ponds in China if you're searching for wholesome, safe foods. But do you eschew fish pulled from a remote lake in a U.S. national park?

Maybe so if you're concerned about eating elevated levels of mercury and chemical flame retardants.

Some trout from secluded lakes in Olympic and Mount Rainier national parks were so polluted they reached unsafe levels for routine human consumption, according to a study out Tuesday.

"We're looking at some of the most pristine areas left in North America that are under the protection of the national parks, and we're finding some alarming results," said Dixon Landers, a senior scientist with the Environmental Protection Agency's National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory.



Read more: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/352814_parkpollute27.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jane Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are they carrying them in backpacks or
hand bags?

:)

Sorry, this old English teacher couldn't resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Doesn't that mean that all of us are being poisoned on a daily basis?
If trout in remote areas are being poisoned by toxic airborne particulate matter, then wouldn't people in more populated areas also be subjected to the same chemicals, both from the air as well as what is in our food and water?

Yikes. Talk about an "Inconvenient Truth".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-27-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes.
I remember reading a few studies that tested certain populations. It's freakin scary. I'll see if I can dig up a few links...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC